from the Oregonian
The Oregonian has called for a public inquest into the death of Fouad Kaady (editorial, Nov. 1). A grand jury has already listened carefully to the sworn testimony of 40 witnesses and visited the scene of the shooting. In addition, Clackamas County Sheriff Craig Roberts released the police reports after the grand jury's decision.
I do not believe a public inquest would further the important discussion that is ongoing about officer-involved shootings. Under Oregon statutes, a public inquest may be ordered to determine the "cause and manner of death." In this case, those are well known. Furthermore, a public inquest is a flawed legal process. The statutes do not clearly state whether the rules of evidence apply or who may participate. An inquest can turn into a forum to air grievances or personal opinions.
In the last legislative session, Senate Bill 301 would have required that grand jury proceedings in officer-involved shooting deaths be transcribed and made public. Unfortunately, it didn't pass. It would have provided a better way to inform the public. I encourage our legislators to approve it in the next session.
JOHN S. FOOTE
District Attorney
Clackamas County
Thursday, November 9, 2006
Defusing crises dispelling myths
from the Oregonian
Two years ago deputies responding to a call of a resident disturbing the peace shot and killed the woman after she charged them with a knife. The residents, a Clackamas County mental health worker has advised the deputies, are still a little on edge.
The visit is part of the sheriff's office's third semiannual training devoted to teaching officers how to better handle encounters involving people who are mentally ill, who often don't respond well to traditional police commands and techniques and who might act unpredictably at times of crisis.
The sessions begins.
A woman with ice-blue eyes and bangs pinned back with a sparkly clip asks the deputies why they have to carry guns. Guns, she says, petrify her. She's seen what police do with them on TV.
The police officers assure her they use their guns only in true emergencies --not like the actors on TV.
Another resident wants to know whether police stereotype mentally ill people.
"Do you automatically put us in a box?" she asks.
"Do you think mentally ill people have hotter tempers than other people?" asks another.
And another resident chimes in: "Don't you have a code --1151 or something --to refer to us?"
"It's 1234," answers one of the deputies, adding that the categorization is only used so police can better help the person in mental crisis. "The police officer will hear that and start asking questions: 'How are you doing?' 'What do you need?' "
By the end of the exchange, the room appears to have warmed some. The residents appear a little more relaxed, and the police officers, too.
The training --known as Crisis Intervention Training --was held late last month. It is the third since Clackamas County Sheriff Craig Roberts took office in January 2005 and said his office must better equip deputies to deal with the increasing number of calls about people in mental crisis.
Roberts said he recognized the need a few years ago as a detective when he responded to the call near Oregon 212 in the Boring area. Roberts showed up to find a suicidal man who'd doused himself with two cans of gasoline and was holding a cigarette lighter.
"I thought 'This is absurd,' " said Roberts, realizing he didn't have training to draw upon. Roberts was able to talk the man into surrendering but felt he was grasping for what to say or do.
Jail data show that as many as 28 percent of Clackamas County Jail inmates have a diagnosed mental illness. But officials say the true percentage of inmates who have mental illnesses --diagnosed or not --is probably much higher.
Sgt. Nick Watt, who helped developed the crisis intervention course, estimates that 50 percent of the calls he responds to involve someone with mental health issues a suicidal person, a car thief on mind-altering methamphetamine, or a combative person yelling at anyone who passes by.
The dangers of police encounters with mentally ill people have been highlighted recently by high-profile incidents in the Portland area, including the September death in police custody of James P. Chasse Jr., a man police thought was on drugs or drunk but who actually suffered from schizophrenia.
In Clackamas County, there have been several incidents in which police shot and killed people acting irrationally or exhibiting mental problems --including Clint Carey, a 24-year-old Carver man who in 2005 duct-taped a knife to his hand and then charged at deputies; Fouad Kaady, a 27-year-old Gresham man who was reportedly growling, naked and non-compliant to police commands in 2005; and Joyce Staudenmaier, the Chez Ami resident shot in 2004, who had battled schizophrenia for nearly three decades.
Clackamas County's 40-hour class teaches participants about the gamut of mental illnesses and the drugs used to treat them. Participants hear mental health experts' advice on how police should approach and speak to people with mental disorders. They also act out scenarios they might encounter in the field.
Portland, and in more recent years, Washington and Marion counties, also have crisis intervention training. Portland Mayor Tom Potter recently said he wants every patrol officer on the Portland Police force to go through the city's 40-hour course, which during the past 12 years has been voluntary.
And starting in January, the state's police academy will increase classroom instruction on how to interact with mentally ill people from three hours to 12. Students seeking a basic police officer certification also will undergo eight to 10 hours of scenario-based training.
In Clackamas County, 75 members of law enforcement --including about three dozen sheriff's deputies and three dozen officers from police departments including Lake Oswego, Oregon City, Canby and Sandy --have been through the sheriff's training. Roberts said his goal is to train all 91 of his patrol deputies in the next few years. So far, he's about a third of the way there.
Sharing experiences
After a few days of intensive classroom training, the Clackamas County class breaks into small groups to tour apartments and group homes of people with mental illnesses; Portland Adventist's psychiatric ward, where police often bring people who are threatening to harm themselves or others; and the Hooper detox center in Portland, where police drop off people intoxicated by drugs or alcohol.
The visits give officers opportunities to interact with people with mental illnesses and those who treat them.
A Milwaukie group home manager tells visiting officers that it's a good idea to turn off overhead lights and sirens when responding to incidents at her group home. Lights and sirens can stir bad memories.
A woman who suffers from depression tells officers that she doesn't like handcuffs because they make her feel like a criminal. And a man tells officers that a little bit of leeway goes a long way with him --he still remembers the officer who let him keep his chewing tobacco in his mouth as he was driving to jail.
At the Chez Ami Apartments, resident Susan Funk tells the deputies that she's happy to talk to them about her police encounters because she wants them to see what she's like 80 percent of the year.
"You only know me when I'm freaking out, and that's why I come to these (trainings)," says Funk, 40, who was diagnosed 17 years ago with bipolar disorder.
Funk is clear-headed, witty and pointed in her conversation with deputies. She says if they happen to encounter her on a bad day, they should try to treat her with respect. She doesn't respond well to harsh commands or force.
"Try to be nice to me if you can," she said. "Try not to corner me. Because that would make me feel like I want to fight and struggle."
Funk also shares her take on the small number of police encounters that go bad.
"It's not only a failure of police," Funk says. "It's also a failure of family, the community and the mental health staff who have not been able to intervene."
Not just a police issue
Funk's statements about mental health officials, family and friends stepping in before a person with mental illness reaches a state of crisis ring true with Watt, who helped develop the class. Watt, the Clackamas sergeant who helped develop the program, says that clearly many people who need help aren't getting or seeking the help --and police are the ones called at the last minute when mentally ill people act out in troubling ways.
Officers can't force a mentally ill person to seek treatment unless that person is presenting a safety threat. In those cases, police try to find a hospital placement, but Watt says too often beds at Portland-area hospitals are full. Once, Watt says, the only bed he could find for an emotionally disturbed person was in Roseburg, 175 miles south.
What's more, admittance to a hospital for psychiatric help might only be a short-term fix, because psychiatric staff release the person once the immediate threat has passed. Too often, mental health experts say, people refuse additional treatment.
Police and mental health officials attribute the rise in mental health-related calls to a fundamental change in philosophy about how to treat people. People with severe mental illnesses used to be institutionalized, said Jessica Leitner, program manager for the county's behavioral health division.
But closing Dammasch State Hospital in the mid-1990s signaled a change in that philosophy in Oregon: Mental health experts came to believe that people with mental health issues were best placed in smaller community treatment facilities, group homes or their own homes.
Having more people with mental health issues living in the community, however, makes contacts with local police more likely.
Eric Cederholm, who has been diagnosed with chronic depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, was eager to talk to crisis-intervention class participants during their visit to his Milwaukie group home. He wants to offer them support.
While training is good, he said, he wants them to know that they won't always be able to talk a mentally ill person through a crisis.
Cederholm said he was determined to die in June 2005 when he pointed a gun at a Milwaukie Police officer, and the officer shot him in the arm, narrowly missing his chest. He still has the scar.
"I was hell-bent," Cederholm tells the class participants. "Some poor (guy) had to shoot me. I'm sure it ruined his day."
Two years ago deputies responding to a call of a resident disturbing the peace shot and killed the woman after she charged them with a knife. The residents, a Clackamas County mental health worker has advised the deputies, are still a little on edge.
The visit is part of the sheriff's office's third semiannual training devoted to teaching officers how to better handle encounters involving people who are mentally ill, who often don't respond well to traditional police commands and techniques and who might act unpredictably at times of crisis.
The sessions begins.
A woman with ice-blue eyes and bangs pinned back with a sparkly clip asks the deputies why they have to carry guns. Guns, she says, petrify her. She's seen what police do with them on TV.
The police officers assure her they use their guns only in true emergencies --not like the actors on TV.
Another resident wants to know whether police stereotype mentally ill people.
"Do you automatically put us in a box?" she asks.
"Do you think mentally ill people have hotter tempers than other people?" asks another.
And another resident chimes in: "Don't you have a code --1151 or something --to refer to us?"
"It's 1234," answers one of the deputies, adding that the categorization is only used so police can better help the person in mental crisis. "The police officer will hear that and start asking questions: 'How are you doing?' 'What do you need?' "
By the end of the exchange, the room appears to have warmed some. The residents appear a little more relaxed, and the police officers, too.
The training --known as Crisis Intervention Training --was held late last month. It is the third since Clackamas County Sheriff Craig Roberts took office in January 2005 and said his office must better equip deputies to deal with the increasing number of calls about people in mental crisis.
Roberts said he recognized the need a few years ago as a detective when he responded to the call near Oregon 212 in the Boring area. Roberts showed up to find a suicidal man who'd doused himself with two cans of gasoline and was holding a cigarette lighter.
"I thought 'This is absurd,' " said Roberts, realizing he didn't have training to draw upon. Roberts was able to talk the man into surrendering but felt he was grasping for what to say or do.
Jail data show that as many as 28 percent of Clackamas County Jail inmates have a diagnosed mental illness. But officials say the true percentage of inmates who have mental illnesses --diagnosed or not --is probably much higher.
Sgt. Nick Watt, who helped developed the crisis intervention course, estimates that 50 percent of the calls he responds to involve someone with mental health issues a suicidal person, a car thief on mind-altering methamphetamine, or a combative person yelling at anyone who passes by.
The dangers of police encounters with mentally ill people have been highlighted recently by high-profile incidents in the Portland area, including the September death in police custody of James P. Chasse Jr., a man police thought was on drugs or drunk but who actually suffered from schizophrenia.
In Clackamas County, there have been several incidents in which police shot and killed people acting irrationally or exhibiting mental problems --including Clint Carey, a 24-year-old Carver man who in 2005 duct-taped a knife to his hand and then charged at deputies; Fouad Kaady, a 27-year-old Gresham man who was reportedly growling, naked and non-compliant to police commands in 2005; and Joyce Staudenmaier, the Chez Ami resident shot in 2004, who had battled schizophrenia for nearly three decades.
Clackamas County's 40-hour class teaches participants about the gamut of mental illnesses and the drugs used to treat them. Participants hear mental health experts' advice on how police should approach and speak to people with mental disorders. They also act out scenarios they might encounter in the field.
Portland, and in more recent years, Washington and Marion counties, also have crisis intervention training. Portland Mayor Tom Potter recently said he wants every patrol officer on the Portland Police force to go through the city's 40-hour course, which during the past 12 years has been voluntary.
And starting in January, the state's police academy will increase classroom instruction on how to interact with mentally ill people from three hours to 12. Students seeking a basic police officer certification also will undergo eight to 10 hours of scenario-based training.
In Clackamas County, 75 members of law enforcement --including about three dozen sheriff's deputies and three dozen officers from police departments including Lake Oswego, Oregon City, Canby and Sandy --have been through the sheriff's training. Roberts said his goal is to train all 91 of his patrol deputies in the next few years. So far, he's about a third of the way there.
Sharing experiences
After a few days of intensive classroom training, the Clackamas County class breaks into small groups to tour apartments and group homes of people with mental illnesses; Portland Adventist's psychiatric ward, where police often bring people who are threatening to harm themselves or others; and the Hooper detox center in Portland, where police drop off people intoxicated by drugs or alcohol.
The visits give officers opportunities to interact with people with mental illnesses and those who treat them.
A Milwaukie group home manager tells visiting officers that it's a good idea to turn off overhead lights and sirens when responding to incidents at her group home. Lights and sirens can stir bad memories.
A woman who suffers from depression tells officers that she doesn't like handcuffs because they make her feel like a criminal. And a man tells officers that a little bit of leeway goes a long way with him --he still remembers the officer who let him keep his chewing tobacco in his mouth as he was driving to jail.
At the Chez Ami Apartments, resident Susan Funk tells the deputies that she's happy to talk to them about her police encounters because she wants them to see what she's like 80 percent of the year.
"You only know me when I'm freaking out, and that's why I come to these (trainings)," says Funk, 40, who was diagnosed 17 years ago with bipolar disorder.
Funk is clear-headed, witty and pointed in her conversation with deputies. She says if they happen to encounter her on a bad day, they should try to treat her with respect. She doesn't respond well to harsh commands or force.
"Try to be nice to me if you can," she said. "Try not to corner me. Because that would make me feel like I want to fight and struggle."
Funk also shares her take on the small number of police encounters that go bad.
"It's not only a failure of police," Funk says. "It's also a failure of family, the community and the mental health staff who have not been able to intervene."
Not just a police issue
Funk's statements about mental health officials, family and friends stepping in before a person with mental illness reaches a state of crisis ring true with Watt, who helped develop the class. Watt, the Clackamas sergeant who helped develop the program, says that clearly many people who need help aren't getting or seeking the help --and police are the ones called at the last minute when mentally ill people act out in troubling ways.
Officers can't force a mentally ill person to seek treatment unless that person is presenting a safety threat. In those cases, police try to find a hospital placement, but Watt says too often beds at Portland-area hospitals are full. Once, Watt says, the only bed he could find for an emotionally disturbed person was in Roseburg, 175 miles south.
What's more, admittance to a hospital for psychiatric help might only be a short-term fix, because psychiatric staff release the person once the immediate threat has passed. Too often, mental health experts say, people refuse additional treatment.
Police and mental health officials attribute the rise in mental health-related calls to a fundamental change in philosophy about how to treat people. People with severe mental illnesses used to be institutionalized, said Jessica Leitner, program manager for the county's behavioral health division.
But closing Dammasch State Hospital in the mid-1990s signaled a change in that philosophy in Oregon: Mental health experts came to believe that people with mental health issues were best placed in smaller community treatment facilities, group homes or their own homes.
Having more people with mental health issues living in the community, however, makes contacts with local police more likely.
Eric Cederholm, who has been diagnosed with chronic depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, was eager to talk to crisis-intervention class participants during their visit to his Milwaukie group home. He wants to offer them support.
While training is good, he said, he wants them to know that they won't always be able to talk a mentally ill person through a crisis.
Cederholm said he was determined to die in June 2005 when he pointed a gun at a Milwaukie Police officer, and the officer shot him in the arm, narrowly missing his chest. He still has the scar.
"I was hell-bent," Cederholm tells the class participants. "Some poor (guy) had to shoot me. I'm sure it ruined his day."
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Portland Residents Protest Police Killings
from BreakTheChains.info
Around fifty people gathered at the North Park Blocks in
downtown Portland today to protest police brutality and the recent
death of James Chasse who died in police custody. The event was held
in conjunction with similar events around the country to highlight
police abuses, but was organized autonomously of the national
coalition. Most participants dressed in black to show support for the
families of people killed by police.
People started banging on plastic bucket drums and a parade formed
behind the banner "Cops and Klan go hand in hand." People paraded
through downtown streets chanting against police abuse and the system
that fosters it. Portland police remained mostly out of sight except
for a few plainclothes officers videotaping the crowd.
The parade ended in Pioneer Square where people unrelated to protest
held signs reading "free hugs." Many people accepted the free hugs.
People soon gathered again to talk about police abuse and why they
were there. The names of people killed by the police in the Portland
area were announced over the megaphone. One man spoke in detail about
how his cousin Fouad Kaady was murdered by police. These speeches
attracted more people from the square who were curious what was going
on.
The event ended without incident. Some participants expressed the
need to do more outreach and education to get more people involved in
the future. Others expressed the continued importance of people
standing in solidarity with the families and friends of people
victimized by the police.
Around fifty people gathered at the North Park Blocks in
downtown Portland today to protest police brutality and the recent
death of James Chasse who died in police custody. The event was held
in conjunction with similar events around the country to highlight
police abuses, but was organized autonomously of the national
coalition. Most participants dressed in black to show support for the
families of people killed by police.
People started banging on plastic bucket drums and a parade formed
behind the banner "Cops and Klan go hand in hand." People paraded
through downtown streets chanting against police abuse and the system
that fosters it. Portland police remained mostly out of sight except
for a few plainclothes officers videotaping the crowd.
The parade ended in Pioneer Square where people unrelated to protest
held signs reading "free hugs." Many people accepted the free hugs.
People soon gathered again to talk about police abuse and why they
were there. The names of people killed by the police in the Portland
area were announced over the megaphone. One man spoke in detail about
how his cousin Fouad Kaady was murdered by police. These speeches
attracted more people from the square who were curious what was going
on.
The event ended without incident. Some participants expressed the
need to do more outreach and education to get more people involved in
the future. Others expressed the continued importance of people
standing in solidarity with the families and friends of people
victimized by the police.
Monday, October 9, 2006
Local police fire back on shooting rules
from the Oregonian
Last week I wrote about a former policeman who questioned whether police these days are trained to worry too much about their own welfare.
Several local policemen responded that officers are not paid to get hurt or die. Wrote one: "Bottom line, when people arm themselves with knives or other weapons, and refuse to follow commands given to them by officers, they are likely to be shot before they can take action to harm or kill an officer. That is how it should be."
Jeff Leighty, a 20-year veteran and president of the Oregon State Police Officers' Association, e-mailed that in response to my column he'd canceled his subscription to The Oregonian.
By that logic, we should all vote against police levies simply because we disagree with something cops have done.
The truth is, both sides of the debate about shootings involving officers seem frozen in their own beliefs.
When I wrote, last year, that I understood the difficult spot cops found themselves in during the odd string of events that led to the tragic fatal police shooting of 27-year-old Fouad Kaady in Sandy, I got many angry responses about my blind allegiance to police.
One of the people who disagreed with me about that shooting was Ray O'Driscoll, the former San Francisco Bay Area policeman I wrote about last week.
Many current and former police officers were upset I allowed O'Driscoll, whose 12 years of police work came 30 years ago, to question current police training.
Of course, it makes no difference whether O'Driscoll was ever a cop. His questions are reasonable questions long debated by deadly force experts.
One of the nation's most prominent researchers in police training and accountability, James Fyfe, was serving as deputy commissioner for training of the New York Police Department when he died last year. Earlier in his career, Fyfe put in 16 years of patrol work that earned him seven NYPD citations.
In between his two stints at the NYPD, Fyfe was a professor of criminal justice at three colleges and wrote seven books about police work.
Fyfe was a perpetual critic of police training, saying it over-emphasizes the dangers of police work, which he found to be far safer than everything from bartending to construction. And he found that police guidelines are rarely specific enough about when to use deadly force or what the repercussions will be for misusing it. As a result, Fyfe said police often perceive danger where there is none and fire away.
Fyfe's studies concluded that there is little relationship between the number of people police shoot and how safe the police, or the public, are.
Fyfe believed the way to create more useful police standards is for communities to be outspoken about what they want and what they will not tolerate.
If communities don't force cops to include citizens in the discussion, nothing is likely to change, Fyfe said.
Of the dozens of responses I got from cops last week, only retired Portland policeman Jim Powell seemed interested in discussing the issue.
A 26-year veteran, he was a firearms and defensive tactics instructor and served as one of eight regional training coordinators in Oregon.
He didn't like my column. But after his anger cooled, he wanted to talk.
Powell, like Fyfe, believes police training can always improve. But he believes local police are carefully trained to consider all their other options before they pull the trigger.
He's never favored any type of citizen review committee to look at shootings involving officers. Still, he agrees that police policies must mirror what the community wants.
But public input, he says, "needs to occur on the front end," not during the public outcry after police shoot and kill.
I don't agree with everything Powell said. He doesn't agree with everything I said. But we've agreed to continue the conversation.
It may not lead anywhere at all.
But it beats dropping a subscription or refusing to pay for police.
Last week I wrote about a former policeman who questioned whether police these days are trained to worry too much about their own welfare.
Several local policemen responded that officers are not paid to get hurt or die. Wrote one: "Bottom line, when people arm themselves with knives or other weapons, and refuse to follow commands given to them by officers, they are likely to be shot before they can take action to harm or kill an officer. That is how it should be."
Jeff Leighty, a 20-year veteran and president of the Oregon State Police Officers' Association, e-mailed that in response to my column he'd canceled his subscription to The Oregonian.
By that logic, we should all vote against police levies simply because we disagree with something cops have done.
The truth is, both sides of the debate about shootings involving officers seem frozen in their own beliefs.
When I wrote, last year, that I understood the difficult spot cops found themselves in during the odd string of events that led to the tragic fatal police shooting of 27-year-old Fouad Kaady in Sandy, I got many angry responses about my blind allegiance to police.
One of the people who disagreed with me about that shooting was Ray O'Driscoll, the former San Francisco Bay Area policeman I wrote about last week.
Many current and former police officers were upset I allowed O'Driscoll, whose 12 years of police work came 30 years ago, to question current police training.
Of course, it makes no difference whether O'Driscoll was ever a cop. His questions are reasonable questions long debated by deadly force experts.
One of the nation's most prominent researchers in police training and accountability, James Fyfe, was serving as deputy commissioner for training of the New York Police Department when he died last year. Earlier in his career, Fyfe put in 16 years of patrol work that earned him seven NYPD citations.
In between his two stints at the NYPD, Fyfe was a professor of criminal justice at three colleges and wrote seven books about police work.
Fyfe was a perpetual critic of police training, saying it over-emphasizes the dangers of police work, which he found to be far safer than everything from bartending to construction. And he found that police guidelines are rarely specific enough about when to use deadly force or what the repercussions will be for misusing it. As a result, Fyfe said police often perceive danger where there is none and fire away.
Fyfe's studies concluded that there is little relationship between the number of people police shoot and how safe the police, or the public, are.
Fyfe believed the way to create more useful police standards is for communities to be outspoken about what they want and what they will not tolerate.
If communities don't force cops to include citizens in the discussion, nothing is likely to change, Fyfe said.
Of the dozens of responses I got from cops last week, only retired Portland policeman Jim Powell seemed interested in discussing the issue.
A 26-year veteran, he was a firearms and defensive tactics instructor and served as one of eight regional training coordinators in Oregon.
He didn't like my column. But after his anger cooled, he wanted to talk.
Powell, like Fyfe, believes police training can always improve. But he believes local police are carefully trained to consider all their other options before they pull the trigger.
He's never favored any type of citizen review committee to look at shootings involving officers. Still, he agrees that police policies must mirror what the community wants.
But public input, he says, "needs to occur on the front end," not during the public outcry after police shoot and kill.
I don't agree with everything Powell said. He doesn't agree with everything I said. But we've agreed to continue the conversation.
It may not lead anywhere at all.
But it beats dropping a subscription or refusing to pay for police.
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Ore. case said to raise questions about police training
published in USA Today - blogs
The death of a Tigard, Ore., 18-year-old who was shot by sheriff's deputies has raised questions about "training methods and procedures taught to law enforcement officers throughout Oregon and the nation," The Oregonian reports.
Lukas Glenn was killed Saturday night. According to the Washington County sheriff's department, he was armed with a knife, refused the deputies' orders to drop it and ignored beanbags they fired at him. When he headed toward his house -- where his family was -- the deputies fired their guns.
"It appears to have been very much by the book," Geoffrey Alpert, chairman of the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina, told the newspaper. "The use of deadly force to save people inside that house seems to have been reasonable."
But, said Jack Levin, director of the Brudnick Center on Violence at Northeastern University, a review board "will have to determine whether the pocket knife ... was a realistic threat."
Oregon State Sen. Avel Gordly, a Democrat, is pushing for legislation to give police in the state more training about when to use deadly force. "Barbers and hairdressers receive more training than our police officers," Gordly told the Oregonian.
The death of a Tigard, Ore., 18-year-old who was shot by sheriff's deputies has raised questions about "training methods and procedures taught to law enforcement officers throughout Oregon and the nation," The Oregonian reports.
Lukas Glenn was killed Saturday night. According to the Washington County sheriff's department, he was armed with a knife, refused the deputies' orders to drop it and ignored beanbags they fired at him. When he headed toward his house -- where his family was -- the deputies fired their guns.
"It appears to have been very much by the book," Geoffrey Alpert, chairman of the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina, told the newspaper. "The use of deadly force to save people inside that house seems to have been reasonable."
But, said Jack Levin, director of the Brudnick Center on Violence at Northeastern University, a review board "will have to determine whether the pocket knife ... was a realistic threat."
Oregon State Sen. Avel Gordly, a Democrat, is pushing for legislation to give police in the state more training about when to use deadly force. "Barbers and hairdressers receive more training than our police officers," Gordly told the Oregonian.
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Kaady family names city, county in federal lawsuit
Renowned attorney Gerry Spence hired
By Marcus Hathcock
The Sandy Post, Sep 14, 2006, Updated Sep 20, 2006
The family of Fouad Kaady filed a lawsuit against the city of Sandy and Clackamas County last week in federal court, coinciding with the one-year anniversary of Kaady's death.
Kaady was shot and killed by Sandy police officer Bill Bergin and Clackamas County Sheriff's Deputy Dave Willard Sept. 8, 2005, after a string of seemingly bizarre events including several hit-and-run collisions, a car fire and a possible assault.
He was naked, bleeding and severely burned during the fatal police encounter near Cottrell Grade School, northwest of Sandy.
The 31-page lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court on Wednesday, Sept. 6, claims that the county, the city and the officers violated Kaady’s civil rights. The 10-claim complaint alleges excessive force, unconstitutional arrest and wrongful death.
Specifically, the suit accuses the defendants of “unreasonable use of a Taser weapon”, “unreasonable use of deadly force”, “unconstitutional municipal policy” in Clackamas County and in the city of Sandy, “unlawful policy” by the acts of Clackamas County Sheriff Craig Roberts and Sandy Police Chief Harold Skelton, having an “informal custom and policy” that encourages Taser use over physical restraint tactics, and initiating an unconstitutional arrest.
Furthermore, it claims that the police-involved shooting was “oppressive, malicious … (and) motivated by evil motive or intent.”
Kaady family members seek monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial. That amount would include memorial service expenses, the loss of Kaady’s lifetime wages, compensation for pain and suffering, attorneys’ fees and punitive judgments against the officers.
“We’re hoping for a fair and just exploration of what happened, and maybe some result that will be a living testament to Fouad Kaady’s life,” said Michelle Burrows one of the Kaady family’s attorneys.
A Clackamas County Grand Jury cleared Bergin and Willard of all wrongdoing last year and an internal investigation by the sheriff’s office and the Sandy Police Department determined that they had fully complied with department policies and procedures. Both officers have returned to duty.
Sheriff Craig Roberts and Sandy Police Chief Harold Skelton defended the actions of the officers, saying that in unstable situations such as the Kaady case, sometimes split-second decisions must be made to protect law enforcement officers.
The family has hired Wyoming attorney Gerry Spence, who is known for handling high-profile cases. He represented Brandon Mayfield – the Portland-area man whose fingerprints were erroneously linked to the 2004 Madrid train bombings.
Spence is most famous for his work in the 1984 Karen Silkwood case, where he successfully argued that Silkwood’s employer – a plutonium production plant – was responsible for exposing her to dangerous levels of radiation. A jury awarded Silkwood’s estate $10.5 million.
He boasts on his Web site that he has never lost a criminal case, and hasn’t lost a civil trial since 1969. Spence will reportedly handle the main arguments in the trial, which isn’t likely to begin for at least a year, said Burrows, the local attorney representing Spence’s firm.
The next step, she said, is to “legally and technically serve the defendants with the paperwork we filed.” The fact-finding, “discovery” process of building the case will begin in the next few months, and a trial will come after that.
“In a perfect world we’d be looking at a trial a year to 18 months from now,” Burrows said.
Skelton and City Manager Scott Lazenby said they have been told by their attorneys not to comment on the pending litigation.
By Marcus Hathcock
The Sandy Post, Sep 14, 2006, Updated Sep 20, 2006
The family of Fouad Kaady filed a lawsuit against the city of Sandy and Clackamas County last week in federal court, coinciding with the one-year anniversary of Kaady's death.
Kaady was shot and killed by Sandy police officer Bill Bergin and Clackamas County Sheriff's Deputy Dave Willard Sept. 8, 2005, after a string of seemingly bizarre events including several hit-and-run collisions, a car fire and a possible assault.
He was naked, bleeding and severely burned during the fatal police encounter near Cottrell Grade School, northwest of Sandy.
The 31-page lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court on Wednesday, Sept. 6, claims that the county, the city and the officers violated Kaady’s civil rights. The 10-claim complaint alleges excessive force, unconstitutional arrest and wrongful death.
Specifically, the suit accuses the defendants of “unreasonable use of a Taser weapon”, “unreasonable use of deadly force”, “unconstitutional municipal policy” in Clackamas County and in the city of Sandy, “unlawful policy” by the acts of Clackamas County Sheriff Craig Roberts and Sandy Police Chief Harold Skelton, having an “informal custom and policy” that encourages Taser use over physical restraint tactics, and initiating an unconstitutional arrest.
Furthermore, it claims that the police-involved shooting was “oppressive, malicious … (and) motivated by evil motive or intent.”
Kaady family members seek monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial. That amount would include memorial service expenses, the loss of Kaady’s lifetime wages, compensation for pain and suffering, attorneys’ fees and punitive judgments against the officers.
“We’re hoping for a fair and just exploration of what happened, and maybe some result that will be a living testament to Fouad Kaady’s life,” said Michelle Burrows one of the Kaady family’s attorneys.
A Clackamas County Grand Jury cleared Bergin and Willard of all wrongdoing last year and an internal investigation by the sheriff’s office and the Sandy Police Department determined that they had fully complied with department policies and procedures. Both officers have returned to duty.
Sheriff Craig Roberts and Sandy Police Chief Harold Skelton defended the actions of the officers, saying that in unstable situations such as the Kaady case, sometimes split-second decisions must be made to protect law enforcement officers.
The family has hired Wyoming attorney Gerry Spence, who is known for handling high-profile cases. He represented Brandon Mayfield – the Portland-area man whose fingerprints were erroneously linked to the 2004 Madrid train bombings.
Spence is most famous for his work in the 1984 Karen Silkwood case, where he successfully argued that Silkwood’s employer – a plutonium production plant – was responsible for exposing her to dangerous levels of radiation. A jury awarded Silkwood’s estate $10.5 million.
He boasts on his Web site that he has never lost a criminal case, and hasn’t lost a civil trial since 1969. Spence will reportedly handle the main arguments in the trial, which isn’t likely to begin for at least a year, said Burrows, the local attorney representing Spence’s firm.
The next step, she said, is to “legally and technically serve the defendants with the paperwork we filed.” The fact-finding, “discovery” process of building the case will begin in the next few months, and a trial will come after that.
“In a perfect world we’d be looking at a trial a year to 18 months from now,” Burrows said.
Skelton and City Manager Scott Lazenby said they have been told by their attorneys not to comment on the pending litigation.
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR - Police shooting: Nonlethal tactics needed
from the Oregonian
We were aghast to learn of the killing this weekend of Tigard-area teen Lukus Glenn by Washington County sheriff's deputies ("Police kill 18-year-old near Tigard," Sept. 17, and "Mom: 9-1-1 call was to help son," Sept. 18).
Something went terribly wrong here. Having raised three children, we know that there are occasions when teens may be out of control and defiant, especially if alcohol is involved. Glenn's parents did exactly the right thing when their son appeared to be out of control and self-destructive: They asked for help.
They expected that their son might have to be arrested for the night, sober up and face the consequences of extreme behavior. The last thing they expected, we're sure, was that law enforcement officers would escalate the situation even further.
If Glenn had been a wild animal cornered in the neighborhood, chances are he would have been tranquilized and transported unconscious back to a friendly habitat. Why couldn't that have happened for Glenn?
We weren't there, and we don't know the exact circumstances as events played out, but we suggest a different type of training for the officers is needed. Defiance is not sufficient reason to take a life.
Bring out the Tasers, stall, negotiate, do something else --anything rather than escalate to final justice so quickly.
Our sympathies go out to the parents who raised a promising young man who just needed a little help and some extra discipline getting through the adolescent growing pains. He deserved a better outcome, and so did they.
DENNIS and CHARLENE DOYLE, Redland
The Oregonian reports another police killing of an apparently disturbed person, this time a teenager armed only with a knife. The families of Fouad Kaady and now Lukus Glenn are reeling from a shoot-first, protect-later policy.
When will our police be trained to disarm first without firing multiple rounds to ensure a kill? Why not train police to shoot at the legs of aggressive and disturbed persons who are not armed with guns?
As reported, Lukus Glenn may have been seeking "suicide by cop," but we should train our police to protect our citizens first. Police should use guns only as a last resort, and even then, first to disable suspects --not to slaughter them in a hail of bullets.
PETER KLAEBE, Lake Oswego
As a resident of Washington County, I am shocked by the insensitivity and utter lack of competence these so-called "peace officers" failed to demonstrate. This cry for help from a depressed, confused teenager was answered with a ruthless barrage of gunfire, resulting in a senseless loss of life.
I may not be a crisis tactician, but I believe this tragedy could have easily been avoided with just the slightest bit of common sense and empathy on the part of the police.
ROBERT O'HEARN, Northwest Portland
Extreme police reactions such as in [the fatal shootings of] Lukus Glenn and Fouad Kaady in Sandy will result in the public's loss of trust and confidence in law enforcement. The people will learn to avoid the police for help and resolve the situation on their own. Results, where people take matters into their own hands, also are troublesome.
Sadly, this is life in the bitter and paranoid America.
BRYAN J. DORR
We were aghast to learn of the killing this weekend of Tigard-area teen Lukus Glenn by Washington County sheriff's deputies ("Police kill 18-year-old near Tigard," Sept. 17, and "Mom: 9-1-1 call was to help son," Sept. 18).
Something went terribly wrong here. Having raised three children, we know that there are occasions when teens may be out of control and defiant, especially if alcohol is involved. Glenn's parents did exactly the right thing when their son appeared to be out of control and self-destructive: They asked for help.
They expected that their son might have to be arrested for the night, sober up and face the consequences of extreme behavior. The last thing they expected, we're sure, was that law enforcement officers would escalate the situation even further.
If Glenn had been a wild animal cornered in the neighborhood, chances are he would have been tranquilized and transported unconscious back to a friendly habitat. Why couldn't that have happened for Glenn?
We weren't there, and we don't know the exact circumstances as events played out, but we suggest a different type of training for the officers is needed. Defiance is not sufficient reason to take a life.
Bring out the Tasers, stall, negotiate, do something else --anything rather than escalate to final justice so quickly.
Our sympathies go out to the parents who raised a promising young man who just needed a little help and some extra discipline getting through the adolescent growing pains. He deserved a better outcome, and so did they.
DENNIS and CHARLENE DOYLE, Redland
The Oregonian reports another police killing of an apparently disturbed person, this time a teenager armed only with a knife. The families of Fouad Kaady and now Lukus Glenn are reeling from a shoot-first, protect-later policy.
When will our police be trained to disarm first without firing multiple rounds to ensure a kill? Why not train police to shoot at the legs of aggressive and disturbed persons who are not armed with guns?
As reported, Lukus Glenn may have been seeking "suicide by cop," but we should train our police to protect our citizens first. Police should use guns only as a last resort, and even then, first to disable suspects --not to slaughter them in a hail of bullets.
PETER KLAEBE, Lake Oswego
As a resident of Washington County, I am shocked by the insensitivity and utter lack of competence these so-called "peace officers" failed to demonstrate. This cry for help from a depressed, confused teenager was answered with a ruthless barrage of gunfire, resulting in a senseless loss of life.
I may not be a crisis tactician, but I believe this tragedy could have easily been avoided with just the slightest bit of common sense and empathy on the part of the police.
ROBERT O'HEARN, Northwest Portland
Extreme police reactions such as in [the fatal shootings of] Lukus Glenn and Fouad Kaady in Sandy will result in the public's loss of trust and confidence in law enforcement. The people will learn to avoid the police for help and resolve the situation on their own. Results, where people take matters into their own hands, also are troublesome.
Sadly, this is life in the bitter and paranoid America.
BRYAN J. DORR
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
Officer, Deputy Named in Portland Wrongful-Death Suit
published in KillPolice.com
A well-known attorney takes on a case in which a Portland man was shot seven timesThe family of Fouad Kaady, a 27-year-old Portland man shot and killed by police a year ago today on a rural Clackamas County highway, has hired high-profile, flamboyant attorney Gerry Spence of Wyoming to argue a wrongful-death lawsuit in federal court.
Kaady was naked, burned and bleeding when he was shocked with a stun gun then shot by Officer William Bergin of the Sandy Police Department and Deputy David Willard of the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office.
The 31-page lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court, names the city of Sandy, Clackamas County and the two officers and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for civil rights violations, excessive force, unconstitutional arrest and wrongful death.
Willard and Bergin shot the unarmed man seven times. A Clackamas County grand jury heard testimony from at least 40 witnesses and decided against bringing charges against the two. Additionally, the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Shooting Review Board and a review by the Sandy Police Department found that Willard and Bergin acted appropriately. Both have returned to duty.
Kaady’s family and friends bitterly criticized the grand jury’s decision and insist he had no history of mental illness and did not take hard drugs. They think his behavior was caused by the shock of being badly burned in a car wreck about a half-hour before the shooting.
“There is no doubt in my mind that this was not a justifiable shooting,” said Portland attorney Michelle Burrows, who also will argue the case with Spence’s son, Kent Spence.
Burrows said main arguments in court will be handled by Gerry Spence, who has represented high-profile clients such as white separatist Randy Weaver and Brandon Mayfield, a Portland attorney who was jailed for two weeks in 2004 after his fingerprint was mistakenly linked to terror bombings in Madrid, Spain.
Spence –who often sports a black felt hat and leather-fringed, buckskin jacket –made national headlines in 1984 after winning a $10.5 million settlement for the estate of Karen Silkwood, an Oklahoma plutonium worker.
Lawyers for the Clackamas County counsel’s office are ready to take on the case.
“We feel sorry for the family, but we believe this is a very defensible case, and we will fight it,” said Ed McGlone, an attorney with the office.
Scott Lazenby, Sandy’s city manager, said city officials have been instructed not to discuss pending litigation.
In the official police report, a detective speculated that Kaady’s bizarre behavior before the shooting may have been caused by “excited delirium,” a rare but often deadly medical condition associated with illegal drug use, mental illness or injury, experts say.
People with the condition commonly display incredible strength, are impervious to pain, growl like an animal, are aggressive and take off their clothing because they become superheated.
Clackamas County prosecutors confirmed that Kaady had traces of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, in his system.
Shortly before he died, Kaady smashed his car into three other cars on Southeast Bluff Road. Callers told 9-1-1 dispatchers he was combative and had assaulted a man who went to help him.
The lawsuit claims that both the sheriff’s department and Sandy police have cultures that encourage officers “to taser and/or ’shoot first,’ a pattern of repeated serious violations of the constitutional rights of citizens.”
The suit claims Kaady was not presenting any “objective danger.” It seeks damages for burial and memorial services; general damages for depriving his civil rights; monetary losses to his estate, including the loss of earnings; pain and suffering; punitive damages; and attorney fees.
A well-known attorney takes on a case in which a Portland man was shot seven timesThe family of Fouad Kaady, a 27-year-old Portland man shot and killed by police a year ago today on a rural Clackamas County highway, has hired high-profile, flamboyant attorney Gerry Spence of Wyoming to argue a wrongful-death lawsuit in federal court.
Kaady was naked, burned and bleeding when he was shocked with a stun gun then shot by Officer William Bergin of the Sandy Police Department and Deputy David Willard of the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office.
The 31-page lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court, names the city of Sandy, Clackamas County and the two officers and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for civil rights violations, excessive force, unconstitutional arrest and wrongful death.
Willard and Bergin shot the unarmed man seven times. A Clackamas County grand jury heard testimony from at least 40 witnesses and decided against bringing charges against the two. Additionally, the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Shooting Review Board and a review by the Sandy Police Department found that Willard and Bergin acted appropriately. Both have returned to duty.
Kaady’s family and friends bitterly criticized the grand jury’s decision and insist he had no history of mental illness and did not take hard drugs. They think his behavior was caused by the shock of being badly burned in a car wreck about a half-hour before the shooting.
“There is no doubt in my mind that this was not a justifiable shooting,” said Portland attorney Michelle Burrows, who also will argue the case with Spence’s son, Kent Spence.
Burrows said main arguments in court will be handled by Gerry Spence, who has represented high-profile clients such as white separatist Randy Weaver and Brandon Mayfield, a Portland attorney who was jailed for two weeks in 2004 after his fingerprint was mistakenly linked to terror bombings in Madrid, Spain.
Spence –who often sports a black felt hat and leather-fringed, buckskin jacket –made national headlines in 1984 after winning a $10.5 million settlement for the estate of Karen Silkwood, an Oklahoma plutonium worker.
Lawyers for the Clackamas County counsel’s office are ready to take on the case.
“We feel sorry for the family, but we believe this is a very defensible case, and we will fight it,” said Ed McGlone, an attorney with the office.
Scott Lazenby, Sandy’s city manager, said city officials have been instructed not to discuss pending litigation.
In the official police report, a detective speculated that Kaady’s bizarre behavior before the shooting may have been caused by “excited delirium,” a rare but often deadly medical condition associated with illegal drug use, mental illness or injury, experts say.
People with the condition commonly display incredible strength, are impervious to pain, growl like an animal, are aggressive and take off their clothing because they become superheated.
Clackamas County prosecutors confirmed that Kaady had traces of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, in his system.
Shortly before he died, Kaady smashed his car into three other cars on Southeast Bluff Road. Callers told 9-1-1 dispatchers he was combative and had assaulted a man who went to help him.
The lawsuit claims that both the sheriff’s department and Sandy police have cultures that encourage officers “to taser and/or ’shoot first,’ a pattern of repeated serious violations of the constitutional rights of citizens.”
The suit claims Kaady was not presenting any “objective danger.” It seeks damages for burial and memorial services; general damages for depriving his civil rights; monetary losses to his estate, including the loss of earnings; pain and suffering; punitive damages; and attorney fees.
Friday, September 8, 2006
Police named in wrongful-death suit
from the Oregonian
The family of Fouad Kaady, a 27-year-old Portland man shot and killed by police a year ago today on a rural Clackamas County highway, has hired high-profile, flamboyant attorney Gerry Spence of Wyoming to argue a wrongful-death lawsuit in federal court.
Kaady was naked, burned and bleeding when he was shocked with a stun gun then shot by Officer William Bergin of the Sandy Police Department and Deputy David Willard of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office.
The 31-page lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court, names the city of Sandy, Clackamas County and the two officers and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for civil rights violations, excessive force, unconstitutional arrest and wrongful death.
Willard and Bergin shot the unarmed man seven times. A Clackamas County grand jury heard testimony from at least 40 witnesses and decided against bringing charges against the two. Additionally, the Clackamas County Sheriff's Shooting Review Board and a review by the Sandy Police Department found that Willard and Bergin acted appropriately. Both have returned to duty.
Kaady's family and friends bitterly criticized the grand jury's decision and insist he had no history of mental illness and did not take hard drugs. They think his behavior was caused by the shock of being badly burned in a car wreck about a half-hour before the shooting.
"There is no doubt in my mind that this was not a justifiable shooting," said Portland attorney Michelle Burrows, who also will argue the case with Spence's son, Kent Spence.
Burrows said main arguments in court will be handled by Gerry Spence, who has represented high-profile clients such as white separatist Randy Weaver and Brandon Mayfield, a Portland attorney who was jailed for two weeks in 2004 after his fingerprint was mistakenly linked to terror bombings in Madrid, Spain.
Spence --who often sports a black felt hat and leather-fringed, buckskin jacket --made national headlines in 1984 after winning a $10.5 million settlement for the estate of Karen Silkwood, an Oklahoma plutonium worker.
Lawyers for the Clackamas County counsel's office are ready to take on the case.
"We feel sorry for the family, but we believe this is a very defensible case, and we will fight it," said Ed McGlone, an attorney with the office.
Scott Lazenby, Sandy's city manager, said city officials have been instructed not to discuss pending litigation.
In the official police report, a detective speculated that Kaady's bizarre behavior before the shooting may have been caused by "excited delirium," a rare but often deadly medical condition associated with illegal drug use, mental illness or injury, experts say.
People with the condition commonly display incredible strength, are impervious to pain, growl like an animal, are aggressive and take off their clothing because they become superheated.
Clackamas County prosecutors confirmed that Kaady had traces of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, in his system.
Shortly before he died, Kaady smashed his car into three other cars on Southeast Bluff Road. Callers told 9-1-1 dispatchers he was combative and had assaulted a man who went to help him.
The lawsuit claims that both the sheriff's department and Sandy police have cultures that encourage officers "to taser and/or 'shoot first,' a pattern of repeated serious violations of the constitutional rights of citizens."
The suit claims Kaady was not presenting any "objective danger." It seeks damages for burial and memorial services; general damages for depriving his civil rights; monetary losses to his estate, including the loss of earnings; pain and suffering; punitive damages; and attorney fees.
"Every holiday, every birthday is hard," said Kaady's sister, Andrea Kaady. "His death was a huge earthquake, and the aftershocks will go on forever."
A memorial service marking the one-year anniversary of Kaady's death will be at 11 a.m. Sunday at the St. George Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church, 2101 N.E. 162nd Ave.
The family of Fouad Kaady, a 27-year-old Portland man shot and killed by police a year ago today on a rural Clackamas County highway, has hired high-profile, flamboyant attorney Gerry Spence of Wyoming to argue a wrongful-death lawsuit in federal court.
Kaady was naked, burned and bleeding when he was shocked with a stun gun then shot by Officer William Bergin of the Sandy Police Department and Deputy David Willard of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office.
The 31-page lawsuit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court, names the city of Sandy, Clackamas County and the two officers and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for civil rights violations, excessive force, unconstitutional arrest and wrongful death.
Willard and Bergin shot the unarmed man seven times. A Clackamas County grand jury heard testimony from at least 40 witnesses and decided against bringing charges against the two. Additionally, the Clackamas County Sheriff's Shooting Review Board and a review by the Sandy Police Department found that Willard and Bergin acted appropriately. Both have returned to duty.
Kaady's family and friends bitterly criticized the grand jury's decision and insist he had no history of mental illness and did not take hard drugs. They think his behavior was caused by the shock of being badly burned in a car wreck about a half-hour before the shooting.
"There is no doubt in my mind that this was not a justifiable shooting," said Portland attorney Michelle Burrows, who also will argue the case with Spence's son, Kent Spence.
Burrows said main arguments in court will be handled by Gerry Spence, who has represented high-profile clients such as white separatist Randy Weaver and Brandon Mayfield, a Portland attorney who was jailed for two weeks in 2004 after his fingerprint was mistakenly linked to terror bombings in Madrid, Spain.
Spence --who often sports a black felt hat and leather-fringed, buckskin jacket --made national headlines in 1984 after winning a $10.5 million settlement for the estate of Karen Silkwood, an Oklahoma plutonium worker.
Lawyers for the Clackamas County counsel's office are ready to take on the case.
"We feel sorry for the family, but we believe this is a very defensible case, and we will fight it," said Ed McGlone, an attorney with the office.
Scott Lazenby, Sandy's city manager, said city officials have been instructed not to discuss pending litigation.
In the official police report, a detective speculated that Kaady's bizarre behavior before the shooting may have been caused by "excited delirium," a rare but often deadly medical condition associated with illegal drug use, mental illness or injury, experts say.
People with the condition commonly display incredible strength, are impervious to pain, growl like an animal, are aggressive and take off their clothing because they become superheated.
Clackamas County prosecutors confirmed that Kaady had traces of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, in his system.
Shortly before he died, Kaady smashed his car into three other cars on Southeast Bluff Road. Callers told 9-1-1 dispatchers he was combative and had assaulted a man who went to help him.
The lawsuit claims that both the sheriff's department and Sandy police have cultures that encourage officers "to taser and/or 'shoot first,' a pattern of repeated serious violations of the constitutional rights of citizens."
The suit claims Kaady was not presenting any "objective danger." It seeks damages for burial and memorial services; general damages for depriving his civil rights; monetary losses to his estate, including the loss of earnings; pain and suffering; punitive damages; and attorney fees.
"Every holiday, every birthday is hard," said Kaady's sister, Andrea Kaady. "His death was a huge earthquake, and the aftershocks will go on forever."
A memorial service marking the one-year anniversary of Kaady's death will be at 11 a.m. Sunday at the St. George Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church, 2101 N.E. 162nd Ave.
Thursday, September 7, 2006
State of the Police State: Fouad Kaady’s Family Fights Back
published in Masterpeace
Fouad Kaady was 27 on September 8, 2005 when a gas can in his vehicle exploded, burning him severely. He crashed his car, tore off his clothes, and staggered down the street dazed and confused. Burned flesh fell from his body as stunned witnesses called 911 to summon medical help.
Minutes later, a Sandy, Oregon police officer and a Clackamas County deputy shot Kaady seven times, though witnesses said he was unarmed, naked, badly burned, disoriented, and had not threatened the police officers or attempted to flee the area. The officers had turned back an ambulance that waited in vain to treat the man’s burns.
Neither officer was disciplined and both are still on patrol.
On Tuesday in the federal district court of Oregon, famed litigator Gerry Spence filed a lawsuit on behalf of Fouad Kaady’s family, one year after the tragic event. Here is the link to an article I wrote on the lawsuit. Here is a PDF of the lawsuit.
Fouad Kaady was 27 on September 8, 2005 when a gas can in his vehicle exploded, burning him severely. He crashed his car, tore off his clothes, and staggered down the street dazed and confused. Burned flesh fell from his body as stunned witnesses called 911 to summon medical help.
Minutes later, a Sandy, Oregon police officer and a Clackamas County deputy shot Kaady seven times, though witnesses said he was unarmed, naked, badly burned, disoriented, and had not threatened the police officers or attempted to flee the area. The officers had turned back an ambulance that waited in vain to treat the man’s burns.
Neither officer was disciplined and both are still on patrol.
On Tuesday in the federal district court of Oregon, famed litigator Gerry Spence filed a lawsuit on behalf of Fouad Kaady’s family, one year after the tragic event. Here is the link to an article I wrote on the lawsuit. Here is a PDF of the lawsuit.
Family of Fouad Kaady files federal lawsuit
The Gresham man was shot by Sandy and Clackamas County police a year ago
The Sandy Post, Sep 7, 2006, Updated Sep 8, 2006
The family of Fouad Kaady filed a lawsuit against the city of Sandy and Clackamas County this week in federal court, coinciding with the one year anniversary of Kaady's death.
Kaady was shot and killed by Sandy police officer Bill Bergin and Clackamas County Sheriff's Deputy Dave Willard Sept. 8, 2005, after a string of seemingly bizarre events including several hit-and-run collisions, a car fire and a possible assault.
Police claimed they were threatened by Kaady and maintain that their split-second decision was unfortunate, but justified.
Family members say Kaady, who was badly burned and bleeding at the time of the encounter, was in need of help and was unjustly shot.
Rumors of a lawsuit have circulated since a Clackamas County Grand Jury cleared the two involved officers of all criminal wrongdoing last fall.
In addition to the city and the county, the Kaady family is suing Bergin and Willard individually.
Representatives from the Sandy Police Department, the city of Sandy and Clackamas County would not comment on the case due to the pending litigation.
For background information on the case, read "The Kaady Files" at: www.sandypost.com/news/story.php?story_id=115654635282841200
The Sandy Post, Sep 7, 2006, Updated Sep 8, 2006
The family of Fouad Kaady filed a lawsuit against the city of Sandy and Clackamas County this week in federal court, coinciding with the one year anniversary of Kaady's death.
Kaady was shot and killed by Sandy police officer Bill Bergin and Clackamas County Sheriff's Deputy Dave Willard Sept. 8, 2005, after a string of seemingly bizarre events including several hit-and-run collisions, a car fire and a possible assault.
Police claimed they were threatened by Kaady and maintain that their split-second decision was unfortunate, but justified.
Family members say Kaady, who was badly burned and bleeding at the time of the encounter, was in need of help and was unjustly shot.
Rumors of a lawsuit have circulated since a Clackamas County Grand Jury cleared the two involved officers of all criminal wrongdoing last fall.
In addition to the city and the county, the Kaady family is suing Bergin and Willard individually.
Representatives from the Sandy Police Department, the city of Sandy and Clackamas County would not comment on the case due to the pending litigation.
For background information on the case, read "The Kaady Files" at: www.sandypost.com/news/story.php?story_id=115654635282841200
This is what is wrong with the corporate media
by Cat - published on http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/09/345560.shtml#233959
"Kaady, a suspect in three hit-and-run crashes on the day of his death, was bloody, naked, combative and unfazed by 50,000 volts from a stun gun, when he leapt atop a patrol car and threatened to kill Willard, police said. A Clackamas County grand jury later cleared both officers of wrongdoing."
This is how the corporate media apologists describe the killing. And this is all most people know. This is why it is so hard to find justice. Because these things are framed by the corporate police state, and they are skillfully spun in a manner that makes people not care. The story is everything, and if they can control the story, then they can control the outcome. That is why it is up to us to reclaim our voices and tell the real stories.
In fact, the story of the killing of Fouad Kaady is very different than the strangely dispassionate words in this blurp would suggest. For those who have forgotten, here is what really happened.
Fouad Kaady was driving down the road when he caught fire. It is the belief of many members of his family that he had been transporting gasoline in his mother's car because his truck had run out of gas. This fact is supported by witnesses who observed that the pickup truck he had been driving had apparently run out of gas in front of a local business earlier in the day, and had been towed away. Kaady was seen heading back toward home, to get his mother's car. Witnesses at the tow yard reported that the truck was out of gas. So it does, indeed, appear likely that he had been transporting gasoline, and as he was a smoker, that is probably what sparked the flames. In any event, however it happened, a fire ignited as he was driving the car. We know this, because the fire touched off several small grass fires along the road he was traveling. In addition, at least one witness reported seeing the windows of his car black with smoke as he drove past.
As he was flailing about trying to put out the fire, his car struck another car (driven by Tiffany Stenko), and then another. Moments later, with the cab of his car filled with smoke and fire, he went off the road and crashed into a small wooded area. I almost feel it too obvious to add that most people would not be able to drive much better than he did, if they were on fire. But the corporate media and the police agencies involved in his killing continue to harp on the alleged "hit and runs" that occurred as he was struggling to put out the flames. Whatever.
When the car finally stopped, Fouad got out in a daze. Witnesses note that he was burned over his entire body from the waste up, and that he was bloody and confused. He apparently suffered injuries in the crash, aside from the burns that were so severe that flesh was literally hanging from his body. He was in shock, as is normal when the body suffers this kind of trauma. And, as is often the case when people are in shock, he was confused and not acting very coherent. This is not because he was some drug-crazed weirdo as the media has repeatedly implied. It is because that is how people react when they are injured.
It is at this point that an interesting side detail emerges. Because almost every account of this event in the corporate media makes reference to a "good samaritan" who supposedly "tried to help," but was "kicked in the chest" by Fouad. This helps to build the scary image of Fouad that the media created, the one the public was expected not to empathize with. But there is a strange smell in this story, if one digs for it. Because the "good samaritan" was hiding something. He disappeared into the woods after Mr.Kaady, and when he came out his hands were covered with blood. It was his story to the police that he was bloody because Fouad kicked at him, and he grabbed Fouad's foot to protect himself. No one else saw what happened. The stench starts rising only later, if one digs a little more than anyone in the mainstream media or the police force did. Because as it happens, this "good samaritan" was one Ronald Poirier. He did not tell anyone at the scene, not even the police, that he is in fact Tiffany Stenko's uncle. Remember, she was the woman whose car was initially struck by Mr. Kaady's car. Hmmm. What are the odds that Mr. Poirier just happened to be around right then, just happened to be available to follow Mr. Kaady into the woods to "help" him like that, just happened to forget to mention to the police his relationship to the woman involved in the initial accident? Hmmmm. And yes, Ms. Stenko had a cell phone, and had contacted at least one member of her family prior to Mr. Poirier's fortuitous appearance. Seems odd that the corporate media would continue to refer to a "good samaritan" without asking any questions about this little detail. Unless their purpose is really just to make people believe that this guy was an iredeemable freak who "had it coming," the way the police want us to believe.
After this, Fouad wandered away from the scene. (This is the "run" in the "hit and run" story.) He wandered off down a dirt road through a nearby nursery, and just kept going. People began calling 911 to report him, as he was obviously not well. Injured, losing blood, confused and in shock, his behavior was indeed odd. As anyone's would be under the circumstances. And yes, he was naked. He had been dressed earlier that day, but something about being on fire can leave one looking disheveled and not as socially acceptable as people who weren't nearly burned to death a few minutes before. Go figure.
After awhile, Fouad came to a nursery, where a man named Robert Montgomery was just closing up the door of his semi truck. Mr. Montgomery saw Fouad weaving up the street toward him, and then saw him just sit down in the road, obviously very badly injured. Another witness, Elaine Thornlimb also saw this, as she had been following Fouad down the street to look after him. When he sat down, she stopped her SUV and watched. Dozens of nursery workers also saw what was happening. Moments later, a police car came careening up the road, and almost drove right past Fouad, as he sat there on the pavement. One of the witnesses waved them back, hoping the the cops were there to help this man. It's a common mistake.
And this is the part that makes me sick to my soul. Because both officers, in their own words, have admitted that they could see how badly injured Fouad was from the moment they drove up. Both admit that he was obviously very badly burned, that he had skin hanging from his body. Both say they knew he was unarmed (where ever would he have hidden any weapon?). They described him, in their own words, as being "catatonic," and "in shock." Both acknowledge that, when they approached him, he was sitting quietly in the road. He was posing no threat to anyone. And yet, rather than calling for medical help and waiting for it to arrive, they savagely attacked this poor man as he sat there more vulnerable than any human should ever be.
According to all witnesses, and even to the officers themselves, they leapt out of the car and assaulted Fouad with tasers. One witness told me that they jumped out like Starskey and Hutch, ran over to him and started barking and hollering orders, and then just started tazing him within seconds. Their story is a little different, though not much. They make it sound like they tried to reason with him for awhile first, but even they admit that he never even got up, never raised a hand, before they started searing his already seared flesh with taser barbs. The facts support the witnesses' stories more than theirs, in that the killing took place within seconds. He never made a threatening move, or even so much as a rude gesture. All he did was sit there, unable to comprehend what they were saying. And 28 seconds after they leapt out of their car, he was dead.
They say that they demanded that he lie face-down on the ground, and when he did not comply, they tased him. This "non-compliance," that is the "combative" part of the story we keep hearing. But even both police officers admit that he did not follow their orders because he was not able to. He was catatonic. He was in shock. He was confused. They admit this. And yet, they continue to claim that tasers were appropriate to use when he did not comply. Unbelievable. Even just the fact that they demanded him to lie face down in the first place is inexcusable in my opinion. Remember, this is a guy whose skin was burned almost to the bone. Didn't these people ever take a first aid class? And if not, they what business do they have answering a call like this in the first place?
They tasered him repeatedly. They never gave him a chance to comply. They demanded that he lie down, and then that he "go over there and lie down." (They were directing him to a yard on the side of the road.) Throughout the tasing, he never tried to hurt them, never resisted in any way other than just not to "go over there and lie down." And how could he have complied anyway, as they never stopped tasing him long enough to allow him to do so. The officers describe him as "convulsing" and reacting to the taser as anyone would. Yet the media story is that he was "unfazed by 50,000 volts from a stun gun." Makes him sound like a real, scary monster, doesn't it. And that's the plan.
A witness told me that he heard Fouad begging the police not to tase him. "Please don't, please don't," he repeated. But they did not stop. After being tased and tased and tased, he finally leapt up and tried to get away from the pain, but the officers followed him and tased him again. On another interesting side note, when they tased him this time, he may actually have been attempted to comply with their demands. Because he was trying to run in the direction of the yard they had just told him to "go over there" to. In any event, when they followed him and hit him again with the taser, he turned and tried to go the other way. Blocked by the police car, he climbed up onto it, still in a daze. That is when they shot him to death.
According to Robert Montgomery, who was standing right there, it was so fast he could not believe what he saw. He said there was "no possible justification" for what they did. And here, again, is an interesting detail for anyone who really cares what happened, which the corporate media obviously did not. Because in their statements, both officers repeat an intriguing mantra. Both claim, repeatedly, that right before they shot him, Fouad screamed, "I'm gonna kill you, I'm gonna kill you." Strangely, both officers repeat this in the same, dull monotone every time they say it. As if memorized from a cue card rather than experienced from real life. And strangely, nine other witnesses who were close enough to see and hear the entire incident did NOT hear Fouad make this threat. No one, other than the officers themselves, heard him threaten their lives. Hmmmm.
Why didn't the corporate media see that? It was right there in the police reports. Why did they report the threat, but not the apparent contradiction of the facts? Why did they tell us what the police claimed, without telling us that this claim was an obvious lie? These are questions we must ask ourselves.
In fact, even if he had screamed out such a threat, it would have been irrelevant. Because he was one, small man. He was naked, and burned, and in shock. He was unarmed. He had no way to hurt them. Both officers outweighed him by a substantial margin. Aside from the guns and the tasers in their hands, Bergin actually had guns stuffed in every available orafice. Shit, he even had a gun in his fat little boot. How are we to believe that they could have "feared for their lives," as they claim? How? It is simply not possible that a reasonable person would have thought it necessary to shoot and kill Mr. Kaady under these circumstances. No, such a threat would not have justified this murder, even if he had made it. But the facts show that he did not even say this. They are lying. And if they are lying, then obviously they know that there is no justification for crime they committed. Why doesn't the corporate media say so?
"Kaady, a suspect in three hit-and-run crashes on the day of his death, was bloody, naked, combative and unfazed by 50,000 volts from a stun gun, when he leapt atop a patrol car and threatened to kill Willard, police said. A Clackamas County grand jury later cleared both officers of wrongdoing."
This is how the corporate media apologists describe the killing. And this is all most people know. This is why it is so hard to find justice. Because these things are framed by the corporate police state, and they are skillfully spun in a manner that makes people not care. The story is everything, and if they can control the story, then they can control the outcome. That is why it is up to us to reclaim our voices and tell the real stories.
In fact, the story of the killing of Fouad Kaady is very different than the strangely dispassionate words in this blurp would suggest. For those who have forgotten, here is what really happened.
Fouad Kaady was driving down the road when he caught fire. It is the belief of many members of his family that he had been transporting gasoline in his mother's car because his truck had run out of gas. This fact is supported by witnesses who observed that the pickup truck he had been driving had apparently run out of gas in front of a local business earlier in the day, and had been towed away. Kaady was seen heading back toward home, to get his mother's car. Witnesses at the tow yard reported that the truck was out of gas. So it does, indeed, appear likely that he had been transporting gasoline, and as he was a smoker, that is probably what sparked the flames. In any event, however it happened, a fire ignited as he was driving the car. We know this, because the fire touched off several small grass fires along the road he was traveling. In addition, at least one witness reported seeing the windows of his car black with smoke as he drove past.
As he was flailing about trying to put out the fire, his car struck another car (driven by Tiffany Stenko), and then another. Moments later, with the cab of his car filled with smoke and fire, he went off the road and crashed into a small wooded area. I almost feel it too obvious to add that most people would not be able to drive much better than he did, if they were on fire. But the corporate media and the police agencies involved in his killing continue to harp on the alleged "hit and runs" that occurred as he was struggling to put out the flames. Whatever.
When the car finally stopped, Fouad got out in a daze. Witnesses note that he was burned over his entire body from the waste up, and that he was bloody and confused. He apparently suffered injuries in the crash, aside from the burns that were so severe that flesh was literally hanging from his body. He was in shock, as is normal when the body suffers this kind of trauma. And, as is often the case when people are in shock, he was confused and not acting very coherent. This is not because he was some drug-crazed weirdo as the media has repeatedly implied. It is because that is how people react when they are injured.
It is at this point that an interesting side detail emerges. Because almost every account of this event in the corporate media makes reference to a "good samaritan" who supposedly "tried to help," but was "kicked in the chest" by Fouad. This helps to build the scary image of Fouad that the media created, the one the public was expected not to empathize with. But there is a strange smell in this story, if one digs for it. Because the "good samaritan" was hiding something. He disappeared into the woods after Mr.Kaady, and when he came out his hands were covered with blood. It was his story to the police that he was bloody because Fouad kicked at him, and he grabbed Fouad's foot to protect himself. No one else saw what happened. The stench starts rising only later, if one digs a little more than anyone in the mainstream media or the police force did. Because as it happens, this "good samaritan" was one Ronald Poirier. He did not tell anyone at the scene, not even the police, that he is in fact Tiffany Stenko's uncle. Remember, she was the woman whose car was initially struck by Mr. Kaady's car. Hmmm. What are the odds that Mr. Poirier just happened to be around right then, just happened to be available to follow Mr. Kaady into the woods to "help" him like that, just happened to forget to mention to the police his relationship to the woman involved in the initial accident? Hmmmm. And yes, Ms. Stenko had a cell phone, and had contacted at least one member of her family prior to Mr. Poirier's fortuitous appearance. Seems odd that the corporate media would continue to refer to a "good samaritan" without asking any questions about this little detail. Unless their purpose is really just to make people believe that this guy was an iredeemable freak who "had it coming," the way the police want us to believe.
After this, Fouad wandered away from the scene. (This is the "run" in the "hit and run" story.) He wandered off down a dirt road through a nearby nursery, and just kept going. People began calling 911 to report him, as he was obviously not well. Injured, losing blood, confused and in shock, his behavior was indeed odd. As anyone's would be under the circumstances. And yes, he was naked. He had been dressed earlier that day, but something about being on fire can leave one looking disheveled and not as socially acceptable as people who weren't nearly burned to death a few minutes before. Go figure.
After awhile, Fouad came to a nursery, where a man named Robert Montgomery was just closing up the door of his semi truck. Mr. Montgomery saw Fouad weaving up the street toward him, and then saw him just sit down in the road, obviously very badly injured. Another witness, Elaine Thornlimb also saw this, as she had been following Fouad down the street to look after him. When he sat down, she stopped her SUV and watched. Dozens of nursery workers also saw what was happening. Moments later, a police car came careening up the road, and almost drove right past Fouad, as he sat there on the pavement. One of the witnesses waved them back, hoping the the cops were there to help this man. It's a common mistake.
And this is the part that makes me sick to my soul. Because both officers, in their own words, have admitted that they could see how badly injured Fouad was from the moment they drove up. Both admit that he was obviously very badly burned, that he had skin hanging from his body. Both say they knew he was unarmed (where ever would he have hidden any weapon?). They described him, in their own words, as being "catatonic," and "in shock." Both acknowledge that, when they approached him, he was sitting quietly in the road. He was posing no threat to anyone. And yet, rather than calling for medical help and waiting for it to arrive, they savagely attacked this poor man as he sat there more vulnerable than any human should ever be.
According to all witnesses, and even to the officers themselves, they leapt out of the car and assaulted Fouad with tasers. One witness told me that they jumped out like Starskey and Hutch, ran over to him and started barking and hollering orders, and then just started tazing him within seconds. Their story is a little different, though not much. They make it sound like they tried to reason with him for awhile first, but even they admit that he never even got up, never raised a hand, before they started searing his already seared flesh with taser barbs. The facts support the witnesses' stories more than theirs, in that the killing took place within seconds. He never made a threatening move, or even so much as a rude gesture. All he did was sit there, unable to comprehend what they were saying. And 28 seconds after they leapt out of their car, he was dead.
They say that they demanded that he lie face-down on the ground, and when he did not comply, they tased him. This "non-compliance," that is the "combative" part of the story we keep hearing. But even both police officers admit that he did not follow their orders because he was not able to. He was catatonic. He was in shock. He was confused. They admit this. And yet, they continue to claim that tasers were appropriate to use when he did not comply. Unbelievable. Even just the fact that they demanded him to lie face down in the first place is inexcusable in my opinion. Remember, this is a guy whose skin was burned almost to the bone. Didn't these people ever take a first aid class? And if not, they what business do they have answering a call like this in the first place?
They tasered him repeatedly. They never gave him a chance to comply. They demanded that he lie down, and then that he "go over there and lie down." (They were directing him to a yard on the side of the road.) Throughout the tasing, he never tried to hurt them, never resisted in any way other than just not to "go over there and lie down." And how could he have complied anyway, as they never stopped tasing him long enough to allow him to do so. The officers describe him as "convulsing" and reacting to the taser as anyone would. Yet the media story is that he was "unfazed by 50,000 volts from a stun gun." Makes him sound like a real, scary monster, doesn't it. And that's the plan.
A witness told me that he heard Fouad begging the police not to tase him. "Please don't, please don't," he repeated. But they did not stop. After being tased and tased and tased, he finally leapt up and tried to get away from the pain, but the officers followed him and tased him again. On another interesting side note, when they tased him this time, he may actually have been attempted to comply with their demands. Because he was trying to run in the direction of the yard they had just told him to "go over there" to. In any event, when they followed him and hit him again with the taser, he turned and tried to go the other way. Blocked by the police car, he climbed up onto it, still in a daze. That is when they shot him to death.
According to Robert Montgomery, who was standing right there, it was so fast he could not believe what he saw. He said there was "no possible justification" for what they did. And here, again, is an interesting detail for anyone who really cares what happened, which the corporate media obviously did not. Because in their statements, both officers repeat an intriguing mantra. Both claim, repeatedly, that right before they shot him, Fouad screamed, "I'm gonna kill you, I'm gonna kill you." Strangely, both officers repeat this in the same, dull monotone every time they say it. As if memorized from a cue card rather than experienced from real life. And strangely, nine other witnesses who were close enough to see and hear the entire incident did NOT hear Fouad make this threat. No one, other than the officers themselves, heard him threaten their lives. Hmmmm.
Why didn't the corporate media see that? It was right there in the police reports. Why did they report the threat, but not the apparent contradiction of the facts? Why did they tell us what the police claimed, without telling us that this claim was an obvious lie? These are questions we must ask ourselves.
In fact, even if he had screamed out such a threat, it would have been irrelevant. Because he was one, small man. He was naked, and burned, and in shock. He was unarmed. He had no way to hurt them. Both officers outweighed him by a substantial margin. Aside from the guns and the tasers in their hands, Bergin actually had guns stuffed in every available orafice. Shit, he even had a gun in his fat little boot. How are we to believe that they could have "feared for their lives," as they claim? How? It is simply not possible that a reasonable person would have thought it necessary to shoot and kill Mr. Kaady under these circumstances. No, such a threat would not have justified this murder, even if he had made it. But the facts show that he did not even say this. They are lying. And if they are lying, then obviously they know that there is no justification for crime they committed. Why doesn't the corporate media say so?
Tuesday, September 5, 2006
Kaady Civil Rights Complaint
Here is the PDF file of the civil complaint filed by the Kaady family September 5, 2006
http://stream.paranode.com/imc/portland/media/2006/09/345612.pdf
http://stream.paranode.com/imc/portland/media/2006/09/345612.pdf
Friday, August 25, 2006
The Fouad Kaady files
Story surrounding Fouad Kaady shooting materializes with phonebook-size stack of files from the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office.
By Marcus Hathcock
The Sandy Post, Aug 19, 2006, Updated Aug 25, 2006
Originally published November 2005.
Many new revelations surrounding the police shooting of Fouad Kaady surfaced in a phonebook-size stack of case files released by the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office.
The sheriff’s office had kept quiet about details surrounding the incident until Oct. 24, when it released the stack of information compiled by the multi-jurisdictional Major Crimes Team. Much of that information was presented to the Clackamas County Grand Jury, which ultimately vindicated the officers of any criminal charges.
Part I: Peculiar behavior
While there is debate among witnesses and even Kaady’s friends over whether Kaady was on drugs or mentally disturbed or neither, many who testified agreed that the man was not acting like himself in the hours, days and even weeks before the events that led to his death.
Shortly after the Sept. 8 shooting, one of Kaady’s closest friends for two years, Sarah Maness of Portland, told police that Kaady had suffered from depression several weeks before the incident. “He’s been pissed at everything,” she noted.
Maness said she and friend Tarek Ibrahim had discussed how they were worried about Kaady. “He just wasn’t making sense, mentally,” she said. After she and Kaady had a minor falling out, Kaady told Maness not to call him for a month. She text-messaged his cell phone, to which he replied, “I told you not to call me for a month, so if you want to text back, I'll show you who evil fled is.”
Maness said she didn’t understand what “evil fled” meant, but she and Ibrahim felt trouble was coming. “We knew in our hearts that something was going to happen. We felt it.”
Kaady’s father, Rashid, said his son recently had broken up with a girlfriend, a woman known only as named Alexa from Colorado.
Cousin Thomas Oreste said Kaady had a lot of stress piling up on him, noting that if possible financial problems, possible girlfriend problems and maybe some other less-obvious problem piled up, it was possible Kaady was depressed.
A coworker, Mohammed Jamal, said Kaady had not acted strange in recent memory, just tired. Kaady’s sisters said he was happy overall with his life and the direction it was taking. Vania Kaady said her brother had just received his real estate license and was excited about selling real estate with his mother. The family also was eagerly anticipating a trip to Las Vegas for a cousin’s wedding. Kaady was scheduled to pick up his mother at the airport the evening of Sept. 8.
Despite the concern of friends weeks earlier, no bizarre behavior was reported until about 6:30 a.m. Sept. 8, when Kaady was spotted driving recklessly in the Mt. Hood Community College parking lot. Witnesses claimed he was doing 360-degree turns and burnouts in his pickup before campus security took notice of him.
Responding security officer Jefferson Potts said Kaady’s car had a strong smell of marijuana. When Potts approached Kaady to stop the vehicle from driving erratically in the parking lot, the pickup accelerated and drove over a 3-foot embankment. Potts said Kaady then drove along the top of the berm, proceeding eastbound on Stark before bottoming out on the edge of the pavement.
He was next spotted at his father’s Gresham home, wearing a suit. Rashid said his son’s behavior didn’t strike him as odd.
At about 9:47 a.m., Kaady bought two packs of cigarettes from the Hilton Haven drive-through tobacco store on 212th and Stark Street, a place he frequented.
According to clerk Rudd McGarity, Kaady wasn’t acting like himself. He overpaid for his cigarettes with a jar filled with change and was not interested in getting the additional cash back.
After paying, McGarity said, “He just looked at me a little frazzled.” He asked Kaady if he was OK, to which he replied, “No, I’m not OK.” McGarity said Kaady didn’t act like he was on drugs, but instead acted like “something major just happened to him, like he had the worst news of his life and had to go deal with it.” Kaady drove off without saying another word.
Nearly three hours later, Kaady was spotted at the parking lot for Rick’s Custom Fencing at the corner of 202nd and Stark.
James Blankenship of Rick’s Custom Fencing said he and some coworkers watched Kaady “fool around” in his pickup for about 10 minutes before taking off running, wearing only boxer shorts. “It was weird,” Blankenship recalled.
Dave Lee Lucky of neighboring Gresham Towing said some Rick’s employees told him Kaady had run off flailing his arms.
What happened next is at the heart of the debate over what caused the alleged hit-and-run accidents. Family members say Kaady’s pickup ran out of gas at Rick’s, a claim later substantiated by Gresham Towing.
Kaady, the family says, ran to his father’s house to get a gas can and returned to Rick’s to find his car had been towed. He then took his mother’s blue Buick LeSabre and the gas can to search for the tow lot in the Sandy area.
They said he ignited gasoline fumes coming from the can after he lit a cigarette in the car. The can burst open, setting him on fire and setting into motion a series of events that led to three collisions, a head injury and his death.
But Gresham Towing stated that Kaady’s truck was not towed from Rick’s parking lot until mid-morning Saturday, Sept. 10 — two days after Kaady died.
Part II: Collision course
According to the Kaady family, Fouad drove his mother’s car to find a Sandy-area lot where his pickup was towed from Rick’s Custom Fencing in Gresham.
The next person to see Kaady was Sandy resident Tiffany Stanko, who was on her way home from work, traveling on Bluff Road. As Stanko neared her home, she suddenly spotted the blue Buick LeSabre that Kaady was driving in her rear view mirror, coming up “really fast.”
She said the car hit the back of her vehicle and continued to push her forward at 70 miles per hour. Stanko said she tried to keep her car pointed straight while being pushed, but eventually she began to turn sideways, sending her into a nearby ditch at about 40 miles per hour.
Greg Elwell of Boring said he was stunned as he watched “the end of a horrible accident” in his rear view mirror. He sped up as he saw the LeSabre continue toward him in order to avoid a collision. Elwell said the hood of Kaady’s car was smashed up a couple feet, leaving only a few inches of windshield visibility.
After the LeSabre struck Elwell’s car, he hit his brakes in order to slow Kaady down, since Elwell believed the driver was unconscious. Before long, he said the LeSabre pulled away, and Kaady gave Elwell a “thumbs up” as he passed.
“He was out of control,” Elwell recalled, driving “completely crazy.”
Kaady’s family maintains that Fouad’s erratic driving was caused by a dangerous situation inside the car. They said his pickup had run out of gas before it was towed, and that he had brought a gasoline can from his parents’ house to refuel the vehicle. Kaady lost control of his vehicle when he accidentally ignited the gas can’s fumes with a lit cigarette.
Sheriff’s Detective Steve Hyson later reported that Kaady’s body had severe burns “about his upper torso, face, and into his scalp.” Sandy firefighter Brent Hergert said Kaady had burns from his mid-sternum up, which would have put the man’s health in “serious condition.”
But the Oregon State Police Arson Investigation Team found there was no evidence to indicate that the LeSabre’s fire had started from inside the car. They did not find any remnants of a metal or plastic gas can in the car.
In between the two collisions, Carol Vinnacombe said she saw Kaady pass her on Bluff Road.
“He grabbed onto (his) steering wheel and looked really intensely. It seemed to me his eyes were wide, like he just had this wild look on his face,” she told police.
Vinnacombe said she noticed smoke coming from the front of the car and underneath it but not from within it. She said she never saw flames.
Before crashing into a forested area on Bluff Road near Hauglum Road, Kaady’s car left a trail of three grass fires, which, according to Sandy Fire Captain Art Blaisdell, were about 30 square feet in size and were about 30 feet apart by the time fire crews arrived to extinguish them.
Fire Chief Gary McQueen said the fires were likely ignited because Kaady's car leaked fuel after the collision with Stanko.
After Kaady’s car came to an abrupt stop in the woods, Sandy resident Tamara Sedgwick said she got out of her car and yelled to find out if Kaady was okay. She said a voice then answered back something like, “I’m here. I’ve known you all my life.”
She said a man, later identified as Ronald Poirier, had gone into the woods to help Kaady but had come back after Kaady allegedly kicked him in the chest. After Poirier came out, Sedgwick said Kaady kept saying, “Yeah, come back in here. Come back in here; I’m hurt,” but not sincerely, in a “taunting” way.
“He was yelling, almost screaming,” she recalled. “It wasn’t the voice of somebody who was in desperation and dying; more smart allecky. He was definitely not acting normal.”
Witness Frayne Leigh McAtee of Edmonds, Wash., also said Kaady was screaming in the woods, like he was angry with someone.
Poirier, a surveyor working in the area, said he immediately ran into the woods to check on Kaady after seeing his car crash. He said he found the man standing in the wooded area, totally naked, about 25 to 30 yards away from the roadway.
He asked Kaady if he was okay, to which the man mimicked, “Are you okay?” in what Poirier said was a “sarcastic tone.” He said Kaady then ran at him, jumped up and kicked him hard in the center of his chest.
Poirier said he grabbed Kaady’s foot and spun him down the ground before running out of the woods. He too said Kaady called out after him, saying, “Come on, come on, anytime.”
Kaady’s family has alleged that Poirier had sought out Kaady after learning that he had caused the man’s niece, Stanko, to crash her car. According to Kaady’s cousin Zaki Kahl, Poirier came at Fouad with a bat and grabbed him. Kahl said Kaady kicked Poirier to defend himself.
Poirier said he had no knowledge of his niece’s wreck until coming home after the incident, and no knowledge of the accident’s connection to the naked man until hours later.
The group of people standing in front of the burning car told 9-1-1 operators that they heard what they thought was a gunshot from within the forest, but investigators never found a gun at the scene. McQueen said the sound likely came from the LeSabre’s tires exploding during the car fire.
Nearly a dozen people called to report the car fire and the various brush fires that had started to grow. Sandy Police Officer Bergin and Sheriff’s deputy Willard were among those sent to the fire scene to protect Sandy firefighters tasked with extinguishing the blazes. Bergin blocked the road with his patrol car. With reports of a naked, possibly armed man in the woods, Deputy Willard took out his shotgun to give firefighters cover had they needed it.
Meanwhile, after walking westward through the woods and the property of a nearby nursery, Kaady emerged on Southeast 362nd Avenue, bleeding and burned. He walked northbound on 362nd and quickly caught the attention of many in the area.
Sherri Markham saw Kaady after her dog started barking at the man. Markham said Kaady appeared to have a “normal gait,” and that there was nothing odd about him, other than the fact that he was naked and bloody.
The officers were advised that a state trooper had been flagged down by a woman who claimed a naked man was walking down Southeast 362nd Avenue. Bergin and Willard ran toward Bergin’s patrol vehicle. Willard hung on to his shotgun. The two headed north on Bluff Road as Kaady encountered more people on 362nd.
Paul White was working in his front yard when Kaady passed him. “He wasn’t saying any words,” White recalled. “He was just making noises.” White said Kaady “looked pretty bad,” with a “good share of his body covered in blood.”
Kaady came within 10 feet of White and grunted at him.
“The look in his eyes was like a dazed look,” White said.
The close encounter frightened White enough to prompt him to grab a stick for protection. “I didn’t even know what I was dealing with at the time.”
As Kaady walked down the road, White said the man was “howling like a wolf and acting like an airplane. He was just acting goofy.”
Herbert Lloyd was also outside his house when Kaady walked by. He described the man as “painted up all red, screaming, and trotting stark naked.”
Elaine Thornlimb had followed Kaady in her SUV since the man emerged onto 362nd. She said Kaady waved at her and seemed unaware of his injuries. When dogs barked at him, she said he would bark back.
Thornlimb trailed Kaady slowly while she called 9-1-1 to get the man medical help and motioned other would-be Good Samaritans away. Two different times during his northbound walk, Kaady turned around, jumped on Thornlimb’s vehicle and pounded on her sunroof. After the second time, he sat down on the road, cross-legged and growling.
It was then that the patrol car carrying Bergin and Willard approached from the north.
Part III: Confrontation
Fouad Kaady already had been through a lot by the time police found him traveling northbound on Southeast 362nd Avenue. Witnesses said he drove erratically in the Mt. Hood Community College parking lot and appeared to have “lost everything” while at a drive-through cigarette shop.
According to the Kaady family, Fouad drove his mother’s car to find a Sandy-area lot where his pickup was towed from Rick’s Custom Fencing in Gresham earlier that day. Once in the Sandy area, Kaady collided with two different cars, set three grass fires and crashed into a ditch on Bluff Road.
After walking westward through the woods and the property of a nearby nursery, Kaady emerged on Southeast 362nd Avenue, naked, bleeding and burned. He walked northbound and quickly caught the attention of many in the area.
Several witnesses testified that when Sandy Police Officer Bill Bergin and Clackamas County Sheriff’s Deputy David Willard pulled up to the naked hit-and-run suspect, they emerged from the squad car, guns drawn. One of Kaady’s hands was tucked into his lap.
“He appeared to be just kind of catatonic,” Willard said, noting that Kaady was just sitting and rocking, not looking at anyone.
For the next four to five minutes, the officers talked with Kaady, urging him to lie on his stomach, a command Kaady reportedly ignored. Family members say that Kaady did not want to put his burned flesh on the hot pavement, although police say they pointed to a grassy area.
“We wanted to get him to lie on his stomach so that we could get him in restraints,” Bergin said. “That’s one of the safest ways to apprehend a cooperative subject.”
Willard said he wasn’t going to let Kaady leave the scene but admitted he wasn’t sure how he was going to apprehend him, even if he complied. He thought, “I’m gonna wait until other officers get here before we do anything.”
He said he did not want to touch Kaady at all due to the amount of blood that covered the man’s body. Willard was specifically concerned that by touching Kaady, he could contract hepatitis or AIDS.
“Somebody needs to glove up before they touch this man,” Willard thought to himself.
After it was clear to the police that Kaady wasn’t going to comply with their commands, Willard threatened him with a Taser — a nonlethal weapon that delivers 50,000 volts of electricity to a subject via two metal prongs.
“Please don’t,” Kaady said to the police. He wearily begged but still did not comply with the officers’ commands.
One of the witnesses closest to the incident, Ron Van Meter of Van Meter Nursery, said Kaady was growling at the officers and taunting them throughout the exchange.
“He just kind of sat there and shook his head,” Bergin agreed, “and almost had like a grin (on) his face.”
Bergin then sneaked behind Kaady and shot the Taser barbs into the suspect’s shoulder blades, which sent Kaady flat on his back.
“He continued to move a little bit during the first shock,” Willard said, “which sort of surprised me.”
Officers then told Kaady to roll on his stomach or he’d be shocked again. There was no response. Bergin delivered another shock through the barbs that were still in Kaady’s back.
“At this point,” Bergin told investigators later, “he started laughing and giggling.”
Kaady then sat up. Willard fired his Taser, but only one barb penetrated Kaady’s arm.
Then, according to several witnesses, Kaady sprang up with a burst of energy. “He went nutso on them” all of the sudden, said witness Herbert Lloyd.
“He came to life with a vigor of energy,” agreed Karl Neering, who was working at Van Meter Nursery about 50 feet away from the scene. He said Kaady soon realized that the Taser darts were causing him pain, and he physically removed them from his shoulder blades and arm.
“He basically became wilder and wilder. I was afraid,” Neering said.
At about that time, an ambulance arrived at the scene and parked a few hundred feet to the north of the incident. Paramedic Barbara Noland said that from the time Kaady sprang up, “he was wild and appeared to be out of control.”
Willard said Kaady was still visibly being shocked when he got up. “I remembered thinking, ‘Oh, my God, I’m Tasing this guy and he’s getting up.’ And I started to get really scared about the kind of strength I was seeing.”
Van Meter said he was concerned that Kaady was going to come and attack him and admitted that if he came any closer, he would have been forced to run him over to protect himself.
Co-worker Pavel Androsov said the burst of energy sent Kaady running zig-zag toward the patrol car. Witness Robert Montgomery said Kaady “came at” the officers but noted, “He was either trying to get away or was trying to attack them.”
The officers testified that it was the latter. Willard said Kaady ran away from the officers until the Taser darts came out of his body. “Then he turned and faced us,” he said.
They alleged that Kaady had repeatedly yelled, “I’m going to kill you!” as he ran at them. No other witnesses reported that Kaady said that.
Willard said Kaady began to chase him until the suspect leaped onto the trunk of the patrol car. He moved on top of the roof, waving his arms in the air.
At that point, Willard thought to himself, “I’m going to need to shoot this man,” again stating that he did not want to come in contact with Kaady's blood. “I can’t let him touch me.”
It wasn’t long until the officers realized that the shotgun Deputy Willard had brought was sitting on the hood of the patrol car, in plain view. The car’s driver’s side door was wide open, and the engine was running.
Many witnesses said the next few moments happened extremely fast.
Several witnesses said Kaady was just standing and/or jumping up and down on the patrol car and didn’t say that he was in attack stance. But police say Kaady readied himself to lunge at Willard and again threatened to kill the officers.
Bergin said he was concerned that Kaady was about to attack the deputy to hurt him or steal his handgun. He was also worried that the suspect would try to get the shotgun on the hood of the car.
Willard said he didn’t want Kaady to touch him for any reason and yelled, “Shoot!”
He fired three very quick succession rounds at the center of Kaady’s chest. Bergin fired five shots. They shot to kill, assuming that the man was on drugs and that he could have possessed chemically enhanced strength. Toxicology reports, which could corroborate or disprove that theory, will not be released.
Willard said after that after Kaady was hit three times, he exhibited what appeared to be a shocked, surprised look before he fell backward onto the pavement.
The aftermath
Witnesses have varying opinions on the police officers’ use of deadly force. Van Meter said the officers had no other alternative because the man was out of control.
Montgomery said he felt the deadly force was unnecessary since Kaady was docile before being shot with the Taser. Montgomery said he knew police were scared by the way they were moving and acting.
Noland said she was surprised the officers didn’t tackle Kaady since they had the chance when he was sitting on the ground.
Witnesses Elaine Thornlimb and Paul White were also horrified at the incident’s end.
Androsov noted that he thought the police shot Kaady too many times.
A grand jury vindicated Bergin and Willard of any criminal charges, but Kaady supporters continue to protest the action. “Never forget Fouad” stickers have been distributed, and there has been talk of a civil suit against the county or a federal appeal of the grand jury decision. Kaady family attorney Shannon Connall was unavailable for comment as of press time.
Although the police were not indicted and will not face criminal charges, both the Sandy Police Department and the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office have vowed that internal shooter review boards will conduct additional investigations to determine whether policies and procedures were followed in the Kaady incident. Police are due to return the results of those investigations by Friday, Nov. 25.
By Marcus Hathcock
The Sandy Post, Aug 19, 2006, Updated Aug 25, 2006
Originally published November 2005.
Many new revelations surrounding the police shooting of Fouad Kaady surfaced in a phonebook-size stack of case files released by the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office.
The sheriff’s office had kept quiet about details surrounding the incident until Oct. 24, when it released the stack of information compiled by the multi-jurisdictional Major Crimes Team. Much of that information was presented to the Clackamas County Grand Jury, which ultimately vindicated the officers of any criminal charges.
Part I: Peculiar behavior
While there is debate among witnesses and even Kaady’s friends over whether Kaady was on drugs or mentally disturbed or neither, many who testified agreed that the man was not acting like himself in the hours, days and even weeks before the events that led to his death.
Shortly after the Sept. 8 shooting, one of Kaady’s closest friends for two years, Sarah Maness of Portland, told police that Kaady had suffered from depression several weeks before the incident. “He’s been pissed at everything,” she noted.
Maness said she and friend Tarek Ibrahim had discussed how they were worried about Kaady. “He just wasn’t making sense, mentally,” she said. After she and Kaady had a minor falling out, Kaady told Maness not to call him for a month. She text-messaged his cell phone, to which he replied, “I told you not to call me for a month, so if you want to text back, I'll show you who evil fled is.”
Maness said she didn’t understand what “evil fled” meant, but she and Ibrahim felt trouble was coming. “We knew in our hearts that something was going to happen. We felt it.”
Kaady’s father, Rashid, said his son recently had broken up with a girlfriend, a woman known only as named Alexa from Colorado.
Cousin Thomas Oreste said Kaady had a lot of stress piling up on him, noting that if possible financial problems, possible girlfriend problems and maybe some other less-obvious problem piled up, it was possible Kaady was depressed.
A coworker, Mohammed Jamal, said Kaady had not acted strange in recent memory, just tired. Kaady’s sisters said he was happy overall with his life and the direction it was taking. Vania Kaady said her brother had just received his real estate license and was excited about selling real estate with his mother. The family also was eagerly anticipating a trip to Las Vegas for a cousin’s wedding. Kaady was scheduled to pick up his mother at the airport the evening of Sept. 8.
Despite the concern of friends weeks earlier, no bizarre behavior was reported until about 6:30 a.m. Sept. 8, when Kaady was spotted driving recklessly in the Mt. Hood Community College parking lot. Witnesses claimed he was doing 360-degree turns and burnouts in his pickup before campus security took notice of him.
Responding security officer Jefferson Potts said Kaady’s car had a strong smell of marijuana. When Potts approached Kaady to stop the vehicle from driving erratically in the parking lot, the pickup accelerated and drove over a 3-foot embankment. Potts said Kaady then drove along the top of the berm, proceeding eastbound on Stark before bottoming out on the edge of the pavement.
He was next spotted at his father’s Gresham home, wearing a suit. Rashid said his son’s behavior didn’t strike him as odd.
At about 9:47 a.m., Kaady bought two packs of cigarettes from the Hilton Haven drive-through tobacco store on 212th and Stark Street, a place he frequented.
According to clerk Rudd McGarity, Kaady wasn’t acting like himself. He overpaid for his cigarettes with a jar filled with change and was not interested in getting the additional cash back.
After paying, McGarity said, “He just looked at me a little frazzled.” He asked Kaady if he was OK, to which he replied, “No, I’m not OK.” McGarity said Kaady didn’t act like he was on drugs, but instead acted like “something major just happened to him, like he had the worst news of his life and had to go deal with it.” Kaady drove off without saying another word.
Nearly three hours later, Kaady was spotted at the parking lot for Rick’s Custom Fencing at the corner of 202nd and Stark.
James Blankenship of Rick’s Custom Fencing said he and some coworkers watched Kaady “fool around” in his pickup for about 10 minutes before taking off running, wearing only boxer shorts. “It was weird,” Blankenship recalled.
Dave Lee Lucky of neighboring Gresham Towing said some Rick’s employees told him Kaady had run off flailing his arms.
What happened next is at the heart of the debate over what caused the alleged hit-and-run accidents. Family members say Kaady’s pickup ran out of gas at Rick’s, a claim later substantiated by Gresham Towing.
Kaady, the family says, ran to his father’s house to get a gas can and returned to Rick’s to find his car had been towed. He then took his mother’s blue Buick LeSabre and the gas can to search for the tow lot in the Sandy area.
They said he ignited gasoline fumes coming from the can after he lit a cigarette in the car. The can burst open, setting him on fire and setting into motion a series of events that led to three collisions, a head injury and his death.
But Gresham Towing stated that Kaady’s truck was not towed from Rick’s parking lot until mid-morning Saturday, Sept. 10 — two days after Kaady died.
Part II: Collision course
According to the Kaady family, Fouad drove his mother’s car to find a Sandy-area lot where his pickup was towed from Rick’s Custom Fencing in Gresham.
The next person to see Kaady was Sandy resident Tiffany Stanko, who was on her way home from work, traveling on Bluff Road. As Stanko neared her home, she suddenly spotted the blue Buick LeSabre that Kaady was driving in her rear view mirror, coming up “really fast.”
She said the car hit the back of her vehicle and continued to push her forward at 70 miles per hour. Stanko said she tried to keep her car pointed straight while being pushed, but eventually she began to turn sideways, sending her into a nearby ditch at about 40 miles per hour.
Greg Elwell of Boring said he was stunned as he watched “the end of a horrible accident” in his rear view mirror. He sped up as he saw the LeSabre continue toward him in order to avoid a collision. Elwell said the hood of Kaady’s car was smashed up a couple feet, leaving only a few inches of windshield visibility.
After the LeSabre struck Elwell’s car, he hit his brakes in order to slow Kaady down, since Elwell believed the driver was unconscious. Before long, he said the LeSabre pulled away, and Kaady gave Elwell a “thumbs up” as he passed.
“He was out of control,” Elwell recalled, driving “completely crazy.”
Kaady’s family maintains that Fouad’s erratic driving was caused by a dangerous situation inside the car. They said his pickup had run out of gas before it was towed, and that he had brought a gasoline can from his parents’ house to refuel the vehicle. Kaady lost control of his vehicle when he accidentally ignited the gas can’s fumes with a lit cigarette.
Sheriff’s Detective Steve Hyson later reported that Kaady’s body had severe burns “about his upper torso, face, and into his scalp.” Sandy firefighter Brent Hergert said Kaady had burns from his mid-sternum up, which would have put the man’s health in “serious condition.”
But the Oregon State Police Arson Investigation Team found there was no evidence to indicate that the LeSabre’s fire had started from inside the car. They did not find any remnants of a metal or plastic gas can in the car.
In between the two collisions, Carol Vinnacombe said she saw Kaady pass her on Bluff Road.
“He grabbed onto (his) steering wheel and looked really intensely. It seemed to me his eyes were wide, like he just had this wild look on his face,” she told police.
Vinnacombe said she noticed smoke coming from the front of the car and underneath it but not from within it. She said she never saw flames.
Before crashing into a forested area on Bluff Road near Hauglum Road, Kaady’s car left a trail of three grass fires, which, according to Sandy Fire Captain Art Blaisdell, were about 30 square feet in size and were about 30 feet apart by the time fire crews arrived to extinguish them.
Fire Chief Gary McQueen said the fires were likely ignited because Kaady's car leaked fuel after the collision with Stanko.
After Kaady’s car came to an abrupt stop in the woods, Sandy resident Tamara Sedgwick said she got out of her car and yelled to find out if Kaady was okay. She said a voice then answered back something like, “I’m here. I’ve known you all my life.”
She said a man, later identified as Ronald Poirier, had gone into the woods to help Kaady but had come back after Kaady allegedly kicked him in the chest. After Poirier came out, Sedgwick said Kaady kept saying, “Yeah, come back in here. Come back in here; I’m hurt,” but not sincerely, in a “taunting” way.
“He was yelling, almost screaming,” she recalled. “It wasn’t the voice of somebody who was in desperation and dying; more smart allecky. He was definitely not acting normal.”
Witness Frayne Leigh McAtee of Edmonds, Wash., also said Kaady was screaming in the woods, like he was angry with someone.
Poirier, a surveyor working in the area, said he immediately ran into the woods to check on Kaady after seeing his car crash. He said he found the man standing in the wooded area, totally naked, about 25 to 30 yards away from the roadway.
He asked Kaady if he was okay, to which the man mimicked, “Are you okay?” in what Poirier said was a “sarcastic tone.” He said Kaady then ran at him, jumped up and kicked him hard in the center of his chest.
Poirier said he grabbed Kaady’s foot and spun him down the ground before running out of the woods. He too said Kaady called out after him, saying, “Come on, come on, anytime.”
Kaady’s family has alleged that Poirier had sought out Kaady after learning that he had caused the man’s niece, Stanko, to crash her car. According to Kaady’s cousin Zaki Kahl, Poirier came at Fouad with a bat and grabbed him. Kahl said Kaady kicked Poirier to defend himself.
Poirier said he had no knowledge of his niece’s wreck until coming home after the incident, and no knowledge of the accident’s connection to the naked man until hours later.
The group of people standing in front of the burning car told 9-1-1 operators that they heard what they thought was a gunshot from within the forest, but investigators never found a gun at the scene. McQueen said the sound likely came from the LeSabre’s tires exploding during the car fire.
Nearly a dozen people called to report the car fire and the various brush fires that had started to grow. Sandy Police Officer Bergin and Sheriff’s deputy Willard were among those sent to the fire scene to protect Sandy firefighters tasked with extinguishing the blazes. Bergin blocked the road with his patrol car. With reports of a naked, possibly armed man in the woods, Deputy Willard took out his shotgun to give firefighters cover had they needed it.
Meanwhile, after walking westward through the woods and the property of a nearby nursery, Kaady emerged on Southeast 362nd Avenue, bleeding and burned. He walked northbound on 362nd and quickly caught the attention of many in the area.
Sherri Markham saw Kaady after her dog started barking at the man. Markham said Kaady appeared to have a “normal gait,” and that there was nothing odd about him, other than the fact that he was naked and bloody.
The officers were advised that a state trooper had been flagged down by a woman who claimed a naked man was walking down Southeast 362nd Avenue. Bergin and Willard ran toward Bergin’s patrol vehicle. Willard hung on to his shotgun. The two headed north on Bluff Road as Kaady encountered more people on 362nd.
Paul White was working in his front yard when Kaady passed him. “He wasn’t saying any words,” White recalled. “He was just making noises.” White said Kaady “looked pretty bad,” with a “good share of his body covered in blood.”
Kaady came within 10 feet of White and grunted at him.
“The look in his eyes was like a dazed look,” White said.
The close encounter frightened White enough to prompt him to grab a stick for protection. “I didn’t even know what I was dealing with at the time.”
As Kaady walked down the road, White said the man was “howling like a wolf and acting like an airplane. He was just acting goofy.”
Herbert Lloyd was also outside his house when Kaady walked by. He described the man as “painted up all red, screaming, and trotting stark naked.”
Elaine Thornlimb had followed Kaady in her SUV since the man emerged onto 362nd. She said Kaady waved at her and seemed unaware of his injuries. When dogs barked at him, she said he would bark back.
Thornlimb trailed Kaady slowly while she called 9-1-1 to get the man medical help and motioned other would-be Good Samaritans away. Two different times during his northbound walk, Kaady turned around, jumped on Thornlimb’s vehicle and pounded on her sunroof. After the second time, he sat down on the road, cross-legged and growling.
It was then that the patrol car carrying Bergin and Willard approached from the north.
Part III: Confrontation
Fouad Kaady already had been through a lot by the time police found him traveling northbound on Southeast 362nd Avenue. Witnesses said he drove erratically in the Mt. Hood Community College parking lot and appeared to have “lost everything” while at a drive-through cigarette shop.
According to the Kaady family, Fouad drove his mother’s car to find a Sandy-area lot where his pickup was towed from Rick’s Custom Fencing in Gresham earlier that day. Once in the Sandy area, Kaady collided with two different cars, set three grass fires and crashed into a ditch on Bluff Road.
After walking westward through the woods and the property of a nearby nursery, Kaady emerged on Southeast 362nd Avenue, naked, bleeding and burned. He walked northbound and quickly caught the attention of many in the area.
Several witnesses testified that when Sandy Police Officer Bill Bergin and Clackamas County Sheriff’s Deputy David Willard pulled up to the naked hit-and-run suspect, they emerged from the squad car, guns drawn. One of Kaady’s hands was tucked into his lap.
“He appeared to be just kind of catatonic,” Willard said, noting that Kaady was just sitting and rocking, not looking at anyone.
For the next four to five minutes, the officers talked with Kaady, urging him to lie on his stomach, a command Kaady reportedly ignored. Family members say that Kaady did not want to put his burned flesh on the hot pavement, although police say they pointed to a grassy area.
“We wanted to get him to lie on his stomach so that we could get him in restraints,” Bergin said. “That’s one of the safest ways to apprehend a cooperative subject.”
Willard said he wasn’t going to let Kaady leave the scene but admitted he wasn’t sure how he was going to apprehend him, even if he complied. He thought, “I’m gonna wait until other officers get here before we do anything.”
He said he did not want to touch Kaady at all due to the amount of blood that covered the man’s body. Willard was specifically concerned that by touching Kaady, he could contract hepatitis or AIDS.
“Somebody needs to glove up before they touch this man,” Willard thought to himself.
After it was clear to the police that Kaady wasn’t going to comply with their commands, Willard threatened him with a Taser — a nonlethal weapon that delivers 50,000 volts of electricity to a subject via two metal prongs.
“Please don’t,” Kaady said to the police. He wearily begged but still did not comply with the officers’ commands.
One of the witnesses closest to the incident, Ron Van Meter of Van Meter Nursery, said Kaady was growling at the officers and taunting them throughout the exchange.
“He just kind of sat there and shook his head,” Bergin agreed, “and almost had like a grin (on) his face.”
Bergin then sneaked behind Kaady and shot the Taser barbs into the suspect’s shoulder blades, which sent Kaady flat on his back.
“He continued to move a little bit during the first shock,” Willard said, “which sort of surprised me.”
Officers then told Kaady to roll on his stomach or he’d be shocked again. There was no response. Bergin delivered another shock through the barbs that were still in Kaady’s back.
“At this point,” Bergin told investigators later, “he started laughing and giggling.”
Kaady then sat up. Willard fired his Taser, but only one barb penetrated Kaady’s arm.
Then, according to several witnesses, Kaady sprang up with a burst of energy. “He went nutso on them” all of the sudden, said witness Herbert Lloyd.
“He came to life with a vigor of energy,” agreed Karl Neering, who was working at Van Meter Nursery about 50 feet away from the scene. He said Kaady soon realized that the Taser darts were causing him pain, and he physically removed them from his shoulder blades and arm.
“He basically became wilder and wilder. I was afraid,” Neering said.
At about that time, an ambulance arrived at the scene and parked a few hundred feet to the north of the incident. Paramedic Barbara Noland said that from the time Kaady sprang up, “he was wild and appeared to be out of control.”
Willard said Kaady was still visibly being shocked when he got up. “I remembered thinking, ‘Oh, my God, I’m Tasing this guy and he’s getting up.’ And I started to get really scared about the kind of strength I was seeing.”
Van Meter said he was concerned that Kaady was going to come and attack him and admitted that if he came any closer, he would have been forced to run him over to protect himself.
Co-worker Pavel Androsov said the burst of energy sent Kaady running zig-zag toward the patrol car. Witness Robert Montgomery said Kaady “came at” the officers but noted, “He was either trying to get away or was trying to attack them.”
The officers testified that it was the latter. Willard said Kaady ran away from the officers until the Taser darts came out of his body. “Then he turned and faced us,” he said.
They alleged that Kaady had repeatedly yelled, “I’m going to kill you!” as he ran at them. No other witnesses reported that Kaady said that.
Willard said Kaady began to chase him until the suspect leaped onto the trunk of the patrol car. He moved on top of the roof, waving his arms in the air.
At that point, Willard thought to himself, “I’m going to need to shoot this man,” again stating that he did not want to come in contact with Kaady's blood. “I can’t let him touch me.”
It wasn’t long until the officers realized that the shotgun Deputy Willard had brought was sitting on the hood of the patrol car, in plain view. The car’s driver’s side door was wide open, and the engine was running.
Many witnesses said the next few moments happened extremely fast.
Several witnesses said Kaady was just standing and/or jumping up and down on the patrol car and didn’t say that he was in attack stance. But police say Kaady readied himself to lunge at Willard and again threatened to kill the officers.
Bergin said he was concerned that Kaady was about to attack the deputy to hurt him or steal his handgun. He was also worried that the suspect would try to get the shotgun on the hood of the car.
Willard said he didn’t want Kaady to touch him for any reason and yelled, “Shoot!”
He fired three very quick succession rounds at the center of Kaady’s chest. Bergin fired five shots. They shot to kill, assuming that the man was on drugs and that he could have possessed chemically enhanced strength. Toxicology reports, which could corroborate or disprove that theory, will not be released.
Willard said after that after Kaady was hit three times, he exhibited what appeared to be a shocked, surprised look before he fell backward onto the pavement.
The aftermath
Witnesses have varying opinions on the police officers’ use of deadly force. Van Meter said the officers had no other alternative because the man was out of control.
Montgomery said he felt the deadly force was unnecessary since Kaady was docile before being shot with the Taser. Montgomery said he knew police were scared by the way they were moving and acting.
Noland said she was surprised the officers didn’t tackle Kaady since they had the chance when he was sitting on the ground.
Witnesses Elaine Thornlimb and Paul White were also horrified at the incident’s end.
Androsov noted that he thought the police shot Kaady too many times.
A grand jury vindicated Bergin and Willard of any criminal charges, but Kaady supporters continue to protest the action. “Never forget Fouad” stickers have been distributed, and there has been talk of a civil suit against the county or a federal appeal of the grand jury decision. Kaady family attorney Shannon Connall was unavailable for comment as of press time.
Although the police were not indicted and will not face criminal charges, both the Sandy Police Department and the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office have vowed that internal shooter review boards will conduct additional investigations to determine whether policies and procedures were followed in the Kaady incident. Police are due to return the results of those investigations by Friday, Nov. 25.
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Still No Grand Jury Disclosure In Cop Cases
from the Portland Mercury
This afternoon, just before the close of the 2007 session, state representatives and senators managed to usher through Senate Bill 111-C, which requires local governments to set up ways to plan for instances in which police officers use deadly force.
It sets up requirements for planning boards, and certain procedures following deadly use of force. But its most tangible—and therefore most controversial—requirement bit the dust in a last-minute compromise to get the bill through both houses.
SB 111 would have made public all transcripts from grand jury trials in officer-involved deaths; since grand juries are run by district attorneys, and since there hasn’t been a successful case against an officer in pretty much forever, there is widespread belief that the testimony and evidence given to grand juries is weighted in the officer’s favor. This is only the latest effort—and latest failure—to get those transcripts made public, in order for the community to gauge the fairness and accuracy of the trials.
In the case of James Chasse, or Fouad Kaady, or any other case in recent history in which someone’s encounter with law enforcement officers ends in that person’s death, police agencies are able to determine how much, if any, of the grand jury transcripts to release. Frequently, it’s zero—in the Chasse case, police chief Rosie Sizer allowed some of the documents to come out.
The effort to unveil the grand juries in cop cases has been going on for years, but is now dead in the water until at least 2009.
SB 111 was carried by Portlanders—Rep. Chip Shields, and Sens. Avel Gordly and Margaret Carter.
This afternoon, just before the close of the 2007 session, state representatives and senators managed to usher through Senate Bill 111-C, which requires local governments to set up ways to plan for instances in which police officers use deadly force.
It sets up requirements for planning boards, and certain procedures following deadly use of force. But its most tangible—and therefore most controversial—requirement bit the dust in a last-minute compromise to get the bill through both houses.
SB 111 would have made public all transcripts from grand jury trials in officer-involved deaths; since grand juries are run by district attorneys, and since there hasn’t been a successful case against an officer in pretty much forever, there is widespread belief that the testimony and evidence given to grand juries is weighted in the officer’s favor. This is only the latest effort—and latest failure—to get those transcripts made public, in order for the community to gauge the fairness and accuracy of the trials.
In the case of James Chasse, or Fouad Kaady, or any other case in recent history in which someone’s encounter with law enforcement officers ends in that person’s death, police agencies are able to determine how much, if any, of the grand jury transcripts to release. Frequently, it’s zero—in the Chasse case, police chief Rosie Sizer allowed some of the documents to come out.
The effort to unveil the grand juries in cop cases has been going on for years, but is now dead in the water until at least 2009.
SB 111 was carried by Portlanders—Rep. Chip Shields, and Sens. Avel Gordly and Margaret Carter.
Monday, May 1, 2006
Clackamas County Shootings Outnumber Portland;
published on Portland CopWatch
From September to December, 2005 Clackamas County Deputies shot four men, killing three of them; in contrast, Portland Police shot three, killing two, in roughly the same time frame. Clackamas only employs 68 deputies, while Portland has over 900 officers.
As a result of the shootings and a deputy indicted for theft (see Quick Flashes), in late December twelve of the 68 deputies, nearly 18% of the force, were placed on leave. Others were busy conducting the investigations into the shootings.
The first two shootings, reported on in our last issue, were (1) the September 8 killing of Fouad Kaady, an unarmed man who had stripped naked after being badly burned who was shot by a deputy and a Sandy officer; and (2) the fatal shooting of Donald Graham, an unarmed suspect who ran away from a police chase.
The third shooting, which occurred as PPR #37 went to press, was the wounding of Joseph Lee LaMarsh, 23, whose family called police after LaMarsh allegedly threatened his father with a rifle. Though officers say they ordered LaMarsh to come out of the Molalla home without his gun, his sister says he didn't know the police were outside (Oregonian, December 31). LaMarsh survived a shot to the torso by Deputy Geoff Erichsen and was jailed.
The fourth was the fatal shooting of 24-year-old Clint Carey, who supposedly said he wanted to kill a police officer on a 911 call on December 28, at a mobile home park near Carver. He had a knife, and didn't stop after officers tasered him twice, so Sgt. Kevin Layng shot and killed Carey (KOIN- TV, December 29). Layng previously shot a Milwaukie man in 1990 (Oregonian, February 4).
Many in the community were not surprised, but nonetheless outraged, when the Clackamas Shootings Review Board found in January that Deputy David Willard did not violate any policies when he killed Kaady. "Sheriff Craig Roberts offered condolences to Kaady's family and friends, 'Everyone involved would have hoped for a different outcome,'" he said (Oregonian, January 22). Some Portland-area activists including Alejandro Queral, the new director of the NW Constitutional Rights Center, took to the streets of Oregon City on February 11 to protest the decision.
Roberts blamed the string of shootings in December on the holidays, claiming the deputies shot in self-defense against people "sprinting at them with a weapon" (Oregonian, December 30). Interesting notion, but Kaady was unarmed and Graham was allegedly trying to grab an officer's gun when he was shot.
In other Oregon shootings news, Medford Officer John Torgerson shot and wounded teenager Justin Pina, who was allegedly standing over his 55-year-old neighbor with a knife on December 26. The neighbor apparently suffered stab wounds. 17-year-old Pina had been acting violently earlier in the day and police had spoken to him two times (Oregonian, December 28).
From September to December, 2005 Clackamas County Deputies shot four men, killing three of them; in contrast, Portland Police shot three, killing two, in roughly the same time frame. Clackamas only employs 68 deputies, while Portland has over 900 officers.
As a result of the shootings and a deputy indicted for theft (see Quick Flashes), in late December twelve of the 68 deputies, nearly 18% of the force, were placed on leave. Others were busy conducting the investigations into the shootings.
The first two shootings, reported on in our last issue, were (1) the September 8 killing of Fouad Kaady, an unarmed man who had stripped naked after being badly burned who was shot by a deputy and a Sandy officer; and (2) the fatal shooting of Donald Graham, an unarmed suspect who ran away from a police chase.
The third shooting, which occurred as PPR #37 went to press, was the wounding of Joseph Lee LaMarsh, 23, whose family called police after LaMarsh allegedly threatened his father with a rifle. Though officers say they ordered LaMarsh to come out of the Molalla home without his gun, his sister says he didn't know the police were outside (Oregonian, December 31). LaMarsh survived a shot to the torso by Deputy Geoff Erichsen and was jailed.
The fourth was the fatal shooting of 24-year-old Clint Carey, who supposedly said he wanted to kill a police officer on a 911 call on December 28, at a mobile home park near Carver. He had a knife, and didn't stop after officers tasered him twice, so Sgt. Kevin Layng shot and killed Carey (KOIN- TV, December 29). Layng previously shot a Milwaukie man in 1990 (Oregonian, February 4).
Many in the community were not surprised, but nonetheless outraged, when the Clackamas Shootings Review Board found in January that Deputy David Willard did not violate any policies when he killed Kaady. "Sheriff Craig Roberts offered condolences to Kaady's family and friends, 'Everyone involved would have hoped for a different outcome,'" he said (Oregonian, January 22). Some Portland-area activists including Alejandro Queral, the new director of the NW Constitutional Rights Center, took to the streets of Oregon City on February 11 to protest the decision.
Roberts blamed the string of shootings in December on the holidays, claiming the deputies shot in self-defense against people "sprinting at them with a weapon" (Oregonian, December 30). Interesting notion, but Kaady was unarmed and Graham was allegedly trying to grab an officer's gun when he was shot.
In other Oregon shootings news, Medford Officer John Torgerson shot and wounded teenager Justin Pina, who was allegedly standing over his 55-year-old neighbor with a knife on December 26. The neighbor apparently suffered stab wounds. 17-year-old Pina had been acting violently earlier in the day and police had spoken to him two times (Oregonian, December 28).
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Shootings by officers need open review
from the Oregonian
A week that saw two longtime county deputies indicted for felony crimes was capped off Saturday afternoon by a protest calling for a citizen review of why police fatally shot Fouad Kaady last September.
The protest started a new wave of e-mails into my in-box from people questioning why no one was held accountable when police shot and killed the unarmed, naked man.
When you study the police report on the shooting, you probably see whatever you want to see in it. It's not likely to change many minds on either side of the issue about whether police should have shot Kaady.
But in the report, you'll also see the portrait of a hardworking, highly trained Clackamas County deputy who was faced with an incredibly tough decision.
David Willard worked his normal day shift on Sept. 7. Then, when asked to work a few more hours, he agreed to four hours overtime.
He got home a little before 10 p.m., chatted for a bit with family members and had a small bowl of Raisin Bran before hitting the sack.
As always, he was up at 5 the next morning. After showering, he had some oatmeal and orange juice, took his vitamins then read from his Bible for about 20 minutes.
In a few hours, he would be staring across his handgun at Kaady, an enraged, bloody man who was threatening to kill him.
Kaady refused to lie down and charged Willard. After he jumped on top of a police car, Willard and a Sandy police officer feared he might tackle one of them and gain control of one of their weapons. When it appeared Kaady was jumping off the police car, they opened fire.
In October, a grand jury cleared the officers of wrongdoing. Last month, a sheriff's shooting review board found that Willard acted appropriately when he pulled the trigger.
It's easy to lump all last week's news into a pile and question the professionalism of the cops sworn to protect us.
And you'd have to be someone who simply doesn't care if you aren't asking questions about a sheriff's office whose deputies were involved in the shooting deaths of three people last year.
The answers don't come easy. Even when talking with current and former Clackamas County deputies, I got mixed opinions about the Kaady shooting. Some weren't sure it was necessary. But everyone admitted you can't be sure until you're the one standing there deciding whether to pull the trigger.
Sheriff Craig Roberts says he doesn't want to draw up a policy that's too restrictive because every potentially deadly situation is different.
His focus, he says, will be to continue to try to make sure deputies get the best possible training.
That makes sense. And yet, the concern of people questioning the shootings also makes sense. When you're trying to understand why some people feel like cops can get away with murder in the United States, you have to understand the big picture.
Just two months ago a jury in San Jose found a California narcotics agent not guilty of voluntary manslaughter after he fatally shot a man --in the back --who was running away.
It turns out the agent had mistaken the man for a wanted parolee.
In my opinion, the circumstances of that shooting have almost nothing in common with the Kaady shooting.
And as horrible as the verdict might sound in the California case, it has one important thing going for it: the fact that there was a very public process.
I'm not suggesting anyone should have been put on trial for the Kaady shooting. But the sheriff's office only hurts itself when the only investigations of the matter --a grand jury hearing and police review board hearing --are private.
When high-profile matters such as this are handled largely behind closed doors, the sheriff's office only encourages people to believe it has something to hide.
A week that saw two longtime county deputies indicted for felony crimes was capped off Saturday afternoon by a protest calling for a citizen review of why police fatally shot Fouad Kaady last September.
The protest started a new wave of e-mails into my in-box from people questioning why no one was held accountable when police shot and killed the unarmed, naked man.
When you study the police report on the shooting, you probably see whatever you want to see in it. It's not likely to change many minds on either side of the issue about whether police should have shot Kaady.
But in the report, you'll also see the portrait of a hardworking, highly trained Clackamas County deputy who was faced with an incredibly tough decision.
David Willard worked his normal day shift on Sept. 7. Then, when asked to work a few more hours, he agreed to four hours overtime.
He got home a little before 10 p.m., chatted for a bit with family members and had a small bowl of Raisin Bran before hitting the sack.
As always, he was up at 5 the next morning. After showering, he had some oatmeal and orange juice, took his vitamins then read from his Bible for about 20 minutes.
In a few hours, he would be staring across his handgun at Kaady, an enraged, bloody man who was threatening to kill him.
Kaady refused to lie down and charged Willard. After he jumped on top of a police car, Willard and a Sandy police officer feared he might tackle one of them and gain control of one of their weapons. When it appeared Kaady was jumping off the police car, they opened fire.
In October, a grand jury cleared the officers of wrongdoing. Last month, a sheriff's shooting review board found that Willard acted appropriately when he pulled the trigger.
It's easy to lump all last week's news into a pile and question the professionalism of the cops sworn to protect us.
And you'd have to be someone who simply doesn't care if you aren't asking questions about a sheriff's office whose deputies were involved in the shooting deaths of three people last year.
The answers don't come easy. Even when talking with current and former Clackamas County deputies, I got mixed opinions about the Kaady shooting. Some weren't sure it was necessary. But everyone admitted you can't be sure until you're the one standing there deciding whether to pull the trigger.
Sheriff Craig Roberts says he doesn't want to draw up a policy that's too restrictive because every potentially deadly situation is different.
His focus, he says, will be to continue to try to make sure deputies get the best possible training.
That makes sense. And yet, the concern of people questioning the shootings also makes sense. When you're trying to understand why some people feel like cops can get away with murder in the United States, you have to understand the big picture.
Just two months ago a jury in San Jose found a California narcotics agent not guilty of voluntary manslaughter after he fatally shot a man --in the back --who was running away.
It turns out the agent had mistaken the man for a wanted parolee.
In my opinion, the circumstances of that shooting have almost nothing in common with the Kaady shooting.
And as horrible as the verdict might sound in the California case, it has one important thing going for it: the fact that there was a very public process.
I'm not suggesting anyone should have been put on trial for the Kaady shooting. But the sheriff's office only hurts itself when the only investigations of the matter --a grand jury hearing and police review board hearing --are private.
When high-profile matters such as this are handled largely behind closed doors, the sheriff's office only encourages people to believe it has something to hide.
Saturday, January 21, 2006
SHOOTING REVIEW BOARD REVIEW COMPLETED REGARDING FOUAD KAADY
Press Release from: Clackamas Co. Sheriff's Office
SHOOTING REVIEW BOARD REVIEW COMPLETED REGARDING FOUAD KAADY
The Clackamas County Sheriff's Office Shooting Review Board (SRB) has completed the review of the Fouad Kaady shooting incident and presented their findings to Sheriff Craig Roberts and Under Sheriff Charles Bowen. The SRB found that Deputy Dave Willard acted within existing rules and regulations, and according to current training. A copy of the Shooting Review Board Summary and Findings is attached to this release.
The Clackamas County Sheriff's Office has taken the following steps to continue to improve our response to critical incidents:
Crisis Intervention Team training was first presented to several employees in 2005, and more participants are scheduled for the weeklong training starting in February 2006.
Sheriff's Office personnel continue to work closely with many community groups, such as NAMI, and other government agencies such as Clackamas County Mental Health, to further develop our Crisis Intervention Team training, and to implement it department wide as well as offering the training to other law enforcement agencies.
Firearms and defensive tactics instructors are continually reviewing all critical incidents and will consult regularly with subject matter experts, in order to identify ways to constantly adapt and improve in-service training.
Defensive tactics training concentrating on ground fighting techniques and vehicle extraction techniques has been recently provided to all sworn employees as part of regular ongoing required training; this type of training will better equip members to use physical control techniques that may preclude a suspect from escalating the situation to a greater use of force.
Sheriff's Command Staff are also finalizing a policy to replace the Shooting Review Board with a Critical Incident Review Board to review all incidents, which result in death or serious injury to any party. We can learn from every situation.
Sheriff Craig Roberts stated, "On behalf of the entire Clackamas County Sheriff's Office staff, I would like to again extend our condolences to the family and friends of Fouad Kaady. Everyone involved would have hoped for a different outcome."
"After a thorough and careful review, the Shooting Review Board found no violations in the following of current Sheriff's Office policies. However, we will continue to assess our policies, procedures, training and tactics to improve public safety for all citizens of Clackamas County."
"I continue my commitment to protect all citizens, especially those who are most vulnerable. Dwindling available resources for individuals who suffer from mental illness and/or drug addiction, makes this an ongoing challenge to public safety in our community. This is why it is so critical that we look at improving the system-wide response."
"Unfortunately, when these tragic events do occur they can happen in an instant, and the training our members receive is what they rely upon. I am proud of the men and women of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office who have to face these difficult situations day in and day out. My goal is to work together with our own members, our citizens, community groups, and other agencies to do everything we reasonably can to prevent these tragic events from occurring."
Contact Info: Detective Wendi Babst
Public Information Officer
Clackamas County Sheriff's Office
Pager: 503-237-2643
SHOOTING REVIEW BOARD REVIEW COMPLETED REGARDING FOUAD KAADY
The Clackamas County Sheriff's Office Shooting Review Board (SRB) has completed the review of the Fouad Kaady shooting incident and presented their findings to Sheriff Craig Roberts and Under Sheriff Charles Bowen. The SRB found that Deputy Dave Willard acted within existing rules and regulations, and according to current training. A copy of the Shooting Review Board Summary and Findings is attached to this release.
The Clackamas County Sheriff's Office has taken the following steps to continue to improve our response to critical incidents:
Crisis Intervention Team training was first presented to several employees in 2005, and more participants are scheduled for the weeklong training starting in February 2006.
Sheriff's Office personnel continue to work closely with many community groups, such as NAMI, and other government agencies such as Clackamas County Mental Health, to further develop our Crisis Intervention Team training, and to implement it department wide as well as offering the training to other law enforcement agencies.
Firearms and defensive tactics instructors are continually reviewing all critical incidents and will consult regularly with subject matter experts, in order to identify ways to constantly adapt and improve in-service training.
Defensive tactics training concentrating on ground fighting techniques and vehicle extraction techniques has been recently provided to all sworn employees as part of regular ongoing required training; this type of training will better equip members to use physical control techniques that may preclude a suspect from escalating the situation to a greater use of force.
Sheriff's Command Staff are also finalizing a policy to replace the Shooting Review Board with a Critical Incident Review Board to review all incidents, which result in death or serious injury to any party. We can learn from every situation.
Sheriff Craig Roberts stated, "On behalf of the entire Clackamas County Sheriff's Office staff, I would like to again extend our condolences to the family and friends of Fouad Kaady. Everyone involved would have hoped for a different outcome."
"After a thorough and careful review, the Shooting Review Board found no violations in the following of current Sheriff's Office policies. However, we will continue to assess our policies, procedures, training and tactics to improve public safety for all citizens of Clackamas County."
"I continue my commitment to protect all citizens, especially those who are most vulnerable. Dwindling available resources for individuals who suffer from mental illness and/or drug addiction, makes this an ongoing challenge to public safety in our community. This is why it is so critical that we look at improving the system-wide response."
"Unfortunately, when these tragic events do occur they can happen in an instant, and the training our members receive is what they rely upon. I am proud of the men and women of the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office who have to face these difficult situations day in and day out. My goal is to work together with our own members, our citizens, community groups, and other agencies to do everything we reasonably can to prevent these tragic events from occurring."
Contact Info: Detective Wendi Babst
Public Information Officer
Clackamas County Sheriff's Office
Pager: 503-237-2643
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
